You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 188 words from this article are provided below; about 425 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase this article in PDF form for $10.00.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Lynn Hunt | Reviews of Books: To Be or Not to Be a State | The William and Mary Quarterly, 65.2 | The History Cooperative
65.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2008
Previous
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


To Be or Not to Be a State


Lynn Hunt



LAURENT Dubois's passing mention of the Belgians set me to thinking. Belgium's peculiar history raises some interesting issues about the nature of independence and statehood. It has been in the news recently because some observers fear that the tensions between French-speaking Walloons and Dutch-speaking Flemings might lead to a breakup of the Belgian state. Belgium was a fragile construction from the beginning. It gained independence from the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1830 when the great powers agreed to its separation. In 1789–90, by contrast, an attempt to declare the United States of Belgium independent from the Austrians had failed. Unlike other emergent nineteenth-century states such as Germany or Italy, Belgium had no distinct language in which to develop a national literary or cultural tradition. A minor German prince was named king. Originally part of the Burgundian and then the Spanish Netherlands, Belgium never had much of a separate identity until 1830. The current unraveling of this identity shows that the declaration of state sovereignty often expresses a fervent hope rather than an established or enduring reality. . . .

There are about 425 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.