You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 186 words from this article are provided below; about 784 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Reviewed by Laura Croghan Kamoie | Book Review | The William and Mary Quarterly, 61.3 | The History Cooperative
61.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
July, 2004
Previous
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Reviews of Books



The Making and Unmaking of a Revolutionary Family: The Tuckers of Virginia, 1752–1830. By Phillip Hamilton. Jeffersonian America Series. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2003. Pp. xiv, 250.$35.00.)

Reviewed by Laura Croghan Kamoie , American University

      By the 1780s, Virginia's planter class had suffered economic decline and even outright economic disaster. By the 1790s, planters' position, status, and authority were declining. By 1800, only a few estates in either the tidewater or piedmont were prospering, and most estates were wasteful, sloppy, and had low yields. By the 1810s, the kinship bonds that had once unified and strengthened the planter class had largely collapsed. By 1820, the collapse of these kinship networks contributed to making Virginia's elite rigidly conservative, somewhat embittered, disillusioned with the Revolutionary experiment, and nostalgic for the past. The War of 1812, in particular, had seemed to build on changes in the post-Revolutionary period to create "within Virginians a particularly nascent sectionalism based on a vision of a morally superior South struggling to preserve national unity in the face of a grasping and selfish North" (p. 156). . . .

There are about 784 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.