You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 518 words from this article are provided below; about 12481 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Deborah A. Rosen | Women and Property across Colonial America: A Comparison of Legal Systems in New Mexico and New York | The William and Mary Quarterly, 60.2 | The History Cooperative
60.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Notes and Documents


Women and Property across Colonial America: A Comparison of Legal Systems in New Mexico and New York

Deborah A. Rosen



L AW was one of the main determinants of women's experiences in colonial America. Women throughout the colonies lived in patriarchal social systems that limited their autonomy and power. But the specific legal and cultural rules that set the boundaries in which women were supposed to live varied among different regions. It mattered if a woman lived in a colony controlled by a common law system (as in England) or a civil law system (such as that of Spain). When travelers from the United States later encountered Spanish-American law, they scornfully dismissed it as inferior to Anglo-American law. Yet civil law systems were far more protective of women's property than the common law system was. This may not seem to fit the common perception of Spanish law and culture as being particularly patriarchal; it may seem contrary to the assumption that Spanish men expected to exert authority over wives and continued to control children until marriage. And it may not seem consistent with the perception of English law as being more individualistic than Continental European legal systems. Nevertheless, a comparison of women's lives under two different colonial legal regimes shows that women gained tangible benefits from civil law systems that they did not enjoy under common law. 1
     New Mexico provides a good example of the impact of Spanish law on colonial women, while New York provides a more complex example of a civil law system (Dutch) giving way to a common law (English) system. Spaniards arrived in what later became New Mexico in 1540, conquered the Pueblo Indians by the end of the century, established a settlement in 1598, founded their first lasting town (Santa Fe) in 1610, lost control in the Pueblo Revolt of 1680, and regained control in the military campaign of 1693–1694. Spain continued to control the territory until it became part of the independent Republic of Mexico in 1821. New York's colonial period was somewhat shorter. The Dutch arrived in the region in 1609, established settlements there in 1624, and continued to control the area until the English took over in 1664. England briefly lost New York to the Dutch in 1673, regained it in 1674, and began to anglicize the colony more aggressively in 1691 in the wake of Leisler's Rebellion. England then controlled the colony until the American Revolution. 1 Since both Spain and England secured long-term control of their respective colonies during the last two decades of the seventeenth century, that is where this study begins. Comparing New Mexico and New York allows us to explain the differences in laws governing women and property in those colonies and also to explore the practical effects of those laws on women. 2 In wills, probate inventories, deeds, and court records from the late seventeenth to the late eighteenth century, we can find evidence of how the different laws worked in practice and how the civil and common law regimes affected women's control over property and economic opportunities. 3 . . .

There are about 12481 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.