You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 398 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Robert A. Gross | Forum: The Making of a Slave Conspiracy, part 1 | The William and Mary Quarterly, 58.4 | The History Cooperative
58.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


Forum: The Making of a Slave Conspiracy, part 1



IN the late spring and summer of 1822, the city of Charleston, South Carolina, was thrown into turmoil by reports of an imminent slave insurrection. Municipal authorities swept into action to suppress the plot, seize the perpetrators, and convict and punish the accused. The official inquiry, conducted by the Charleston Court of Magistrates and Freeholders, led to the arrest of 128 black men, both free and slave, of whom thirty-five were hanged from the gallows and forty sent into exile "beyond the limits of the United States." At the head of the plot, the court declared, was a free black carpenter named Denmark Vesey, and the purported rebellion has ever since borne his name. 1
     But did a conspiracy exist outside the minds of fearful whites? Doubts were raised at the time, and they have been occasionally vetted by historians, but to little effect. The consensus view has been to accept the judgment of the Charleston court: the insurrection was real, and it was foiled only by the timely actions of white authorities. Scholars have found in the Vesey conspiracy a testament to African-American resistance to slavery and a revealing glimpse into the world of black Charlestonians during the early republic. In this spirit, three books on Denmark Vesey and his abortive uprising appeared in 1999. . . .


There are about 398 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.