You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 459 words from this article are provided below; about 15700 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Stephen D. Behrendt | Markets, Transaction Cycles, and Profits: Merchant Decision Making in the British Slave Trade | The William and Mary Quarterly, 58.1 | The History Cooperative
58.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
January, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


Markets, Transaction Cycles, and Profits:
Merchant Decision Making in the British Slave Trade

Stephen D. Behrendt



IN December 1803 Liverpool merchant John Leigh, recently recovered from bankruptcy, decided to expand his small brokerage business in the coastal and Irish Sea trades and began organizing a slaving voyage with Captain John Ainsworth. During the next four months, they acquired partners for the venture, purchased a sailing vessel, and ordered materials (such as shackles), trading goods and food supplies for a crew of thirty and a human cargo "of about 200 slaves." The partners decided to fit out a vessel for New Calabar, a port in the Bight of Biafra, from which location Ainsworth, after purchasing slaves and provisions, would sail to Surinam to gain information on local and regional slave prices in the Americas. 1
     Leigh and Ainsworth, a mariner who previously had commanded five slaving voyages, knew that their choice of African market was the key decision in the planning stages of the venture. African coastal dealers in different trading outlets demanded specific quantities and qualities of European, Asian, and American textiles, manufactures, firearms, gunpowder, and alcohol. Significant variations in supplies and prices of slaves, foodstuffs, ivory, palm oil, gum, dyewood, and other produce occurred from one African coastal region to another. Ainsworth would have difficulty selling his cargo, which probably comprised two-thirds to three-fourths textiles, firearms, and gunpowder, at markets other than New Calabar or nearby Bonny.1 He could not profitably sail from port to port along the African coast seeking out supplies of slaves and bartering a "disassorted" cargo for them, because merchants "assorted" trading cargoes for specific African markets.2 2
     By the last quarter of the eighteenth century, Liverpool slaving vessels traded competitively at thirty ports and lagoon sites along the African coast from the Senegal River south to Ambriz—north of the Portuguese colony of Angola. In early 1804, Leigh and Ainsworth assessed their market options and decided that New Calabar offered the best opportunity for slaving profits. Leigh anticipated that his captain would trade in the Bight of Biafra during a slave buyers market in the late summer and early autumn of 1804 and then arrive in the Americas late in the calendar year, during a period of planter demand. He was confident that their trading cargo was "well assorted…to enable [Ainsworth] to make a speedy purchase." On June 22, a week before Ainsworth and the brig William departed from Liverpool, Leigh noted that the "vessel is going out with fine prospects. Should she be so fortunate to get safe round we would not be surpriz'd if she would clear £8,000." Because the voyage cost less to fit out, he thus envisaged a profit of more than 100 percent for the partnership. . . .

There are about 15700 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.