You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 163 words from this article are provided below; about 307 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 39.1 | The History Cooperative
39.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2008
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Making Indian Law: The Hualapai Land Case and the Birth of Ethnohistory. By Christian W. McMillen. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. xviii + 284 pp. Maps, notes, index. $38.00.)

      In 1883, President Chester A. Arthur created the Hualapai Indian Reservation in Arizona, following boundaries U. S. Army officers had traced two years earlier. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad (ATSF) laid tracks across the southern edge of the reservation. Following the 1866 Railroad Act, the ATSF claimed alternate sections of land along its right of way within the reservation. The conflicting claims of the giant corporation and the Hualapai people eventually came before the federal courts. A district judge held for the ATSF; the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. In 1941, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote a precedent-setting opinion reversing the lower courts. Douglas's opinion altered the course of U. S. Indian Law and influenced jurists in other English speaking nations. . . .

There are about 307 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.