You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 194 words from this article are provided below; about 344 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 37.2 | The History Cooperative
37.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Summer, 2006
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Inventing Texas: Early Historians of the Lone Star State. By Laura Lyons McLemore. (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2004. ix + 130 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.)

      Inventing Texas is intellectual history, and sad to say, almost too intellectual for most Texans. McLemore explains to our fellow Texans why they think of their history as they do, how those who fashioned the myth of Texas—Anglo-Texan superiority, environmental exploitation, etc.—came to do so, and simultaneously demonstrates historiographical analysis. 1
      Having taught Texas history for nearly forty years and read at least part of the writings of the dozen or so authors whose works are analyzed, I believe that I understand the majority of what the author explains here, but then I may be flattering myself. Either way, I pretty well concur with her conclusions. Texas history, then, is not only myth, it is a small part of a larger American, even Western European myth. Its earliest writers saw only its parts but not the sum of the whole; later writers may have glimpsed the larger picture but by then the grip of the myth was too great. . . .

There are about 344 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.