You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 469 words from this article are provided below; about 10282 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase this article in PDF form for $10.00.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Adam M. Sowards | William O. Douglas's Wilderness Politics: Public Protest and Committees of Correspondence in the Pacific Northwest | The Western Historical Quarterly, 37.1 | The History Cooperative
37.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2006
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 


William O. Douglas's Wilderness Politics: Public Protest and Committees of Correspondence in the Pacific Northwest

ADAM M. SOWARDS




Employing his regional identity and exploiting wide-ranging networks of conservationists and politicians, U. S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas worked from the 1950s to the 1970s to protect various western landscapes including Olympic Beach and Cougar Lakes. His efforts for wilderness reveal the importance of local connections, broader ties, and changing environmental legislation.

When roads supplant trails, the precious, unique values of God's wilderness disappear.
William O. Douglas, My Wilderness: The Pacific West (1960)1



Democracy should accommodate a great diversity of tastes.
William O. Douglas, My Wilderness: East to Katahdin (1961)2


IN JULY 1964, U. S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898–1980) published an article in the Ladies' Home Journal.3 "America's Vanishing Wilderness" came at a significant moment in environmental history. The Wilderness Act would finally pass Congress later that year, providing legislative protection to millions of acres and creating a legal process to preserve more wilderness areas in the years to come. One might not expect a Supreme Court justice to be writing in such a mass circulation magazine, especially about wilderness matters, but it fell within a typical pattern for Justice Douglas and symbolized his approach to wilderness advocacy in both style and substance. First, Douglas brought publicity to his favored cause to a national audience in accessible and persuasive terms. Second, Douglas announced an approach to activism that relied on widespread cooperation among various local and national conservation groups to ensure legal protection for American wilderness heritage. As the individual some consider "the most prominent conservationist in public life" in the thirty years after World War II, Douglas used his national standing and influential network of friends within the Northwest, as well as in the nation's capital, to promote an environmental agenda for the region.4 Douglas accomplished this through the force of his personality and long-standing identification with the region, as well as by expertly navigating the changing political and legal culture of the era. 1
      Throughout his Northwest activism, Douglas alternately focused his enmity on the National Park Service (NPS) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). Common threads linked his hostility toward the agencies and reflected broader conservation goals. He chided the federal agencies for rampant road-building and inadequate wilderness protection, particularly for what he perceived to be undemocratic management and administrative decisions made without adequate public involvement. His solutions corresponded with other conservationists': stop building so many roads; create a perm- anent wilderness system; and open conservation decision-making to the public. While his resolutions to these problems may not have been unique, Douglas's position as a sitting Supreme Court justice, hailing from the West, ensured added interest in and consideration of his perspective.5 . . .

There are about 10282 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.