You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 210 words from this article are provided below; about 289 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 35.2 | The History Cooperative
35.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Summer, 2004
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



A Penny for the Governor, A Dollar for Uncle Sam: Income Taxation in Washington. By Phil Roberts. (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002. xii + 198 pp. Notes, bibliographic essay, index. $35.00.)

      As the title hints, this is no ordinary book on taxation. In engaging fashion, Phil Roberts has, in fact, come close to giving us a page-turner. His account of Washington State's taxation politics, set in national and regional contexts, adroitly chronicles the attitudes of its voters and actions over time by the individuals and shifting coalitions that considered taxing their incomes. Following the 1862 creation of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington territorials saw a federal income tax as an advantage. After statehood, Populist bent perpetuated this view, and by 1911, "the idea of a federal income tax had become almost universally accepted as a means of gaining back from the East what had been taken in the form of interest on bonds and bank deposits, in raw natural resource, and from favorable trade balances with the less developed states of the West" (p. 55). While sentiment would change, later proposals for a state income tax (always supported by the Washington State Grange) continued to win electoral but not judicial approval. . . .

There are about 289 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.