|
|
|
Book Review
Native American Representations: First Encounters, Distorted Images,
and Literary Appropriations. Edited by Gretchen M. Bataille.
(Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001. viii + 265 pp. Bibliography,
index. $29.95, paper.)
|
Reading Native American
Representations, one is struck by David Moore's assertion: "Colonizers
are intoxicated by the violence of dualities" (p. 56). As this
book occasionally proves, scholars have the capacity to get equally
drunk. In toasting the binary opposition of Colonizer and Other,
scholars risk obscuringeven denyingthe multiplicity of experiences
among both Colonizers and Others. |
1
|
|
On the other hand, the Colonizer/Other binary
explains much history. For centuries, Colonizers held the sovereign
literary power to define Native American Others. Whether they represented
Native Americans as noble and doomed or as ignoble and doomed, Colonizers
figuratively and literally dispossessed Indians of their lands and
cultures. Harnessing the word, Colonizers harnessed the world. What
the authors of Native American Representations unanimously
proclaim is that Native Americans, through their literature, now
struggle to harness the word and the world for their own purposes.
That struggle unifies and animates these essays and makes them relevant
to discussions of history, representation, and authorial authenticity. |
. . . |
There are about 487 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|