You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 209 words from this article are provided below; about 328 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 32.4 | The History Cooperative
32.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains? Edited by Devon A. Mihesuah. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000. viii + 335 pp. Appendix, notes, index. $20.00, paper; £13.50, paper.)

     Most of the articles in this collection first appeared in a special issue of the American Indian Quarterly focusing on repatriation. Historians, Native activists, archaeologists, and other scholars contributed essays falling into four distinct categories: the nineteenth-century history of digging and collecting human remains in the United States; the divergent opinions for and against the scientific study of Native American remains; how law and policy have dealt with the issue; and case studies of repatriation in action among the Zuni, Kwakiutl, and Hopi. Seemingly, the only people with a stake in this issue who are not given a voice in this collection are the looters of graves and artifacts mentioned in several articles. Thus, Devon A. Mihesuah, as editor, has succeeded in assembling a useful overview of the repatriation issue that captures the diversity of views, the emotional intensity that has characterized the debate, and the legal and philosophical conundrums facing those who have struggled to reform the law or who now work to implement the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). . . .


There are about 328 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.