You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Michigan Historical Review online. About 165 words from this article are provided below; about 323 words remain.
 
If you are a subscriber to the Michigan Historical Review, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Michigan Historical Review, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Michigan Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Michigan Historical Review, 33.1 | The History Cooperative
33.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2007
Previous
Next
The Michigan Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Reviews



Jeffrey D. Kleiman. Strike! How the Furniture Workers Strike of 1911 Changed Grand Rapids. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Edwards Brothers, 2006. Pp. 165. Bibliography. Illustrations. Index. Maps. Notes. Paper, $14.95.

      The causes of the 1911 Grand Rapids furniture workers strike are familiar to historians. The four-month strike was a result of the clash between liberty of contract and collective bargaining. Before the strike, the furniture manufacturers cooperated to control and successfully "rationalize" the Grand Rapids marketplace through several "mutually advantageous groups" (p. 1). They influenced politics, controlled the means of production, and even became involved in the city's banking system. Workers sought to bargain collectively for a "say in the terms of their employment" (p. 70). Factory owners took a paternalistic view toward their employees and believed that conceding to the collective demands of the workers would result in a loss of control in the workplace and permit "unwarranted interference by wage earners into the affairs of private business" (p. 70). . . .

There are about 323 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.