|
|
|
The High-Speed Photographs of Francis Blake
KEITH F. DAVIS
|
UNTIL RECENTLY, one of the most fascinating photographers
in American history has gone almost completely unnoticed. The originality
of Francis Blake's high-speed photographs of the late 1880s and
early 1890s was clearly recognized at the time: they were exhibited,
published, and widely praised. Unfortunately, however, this work
was soon forgotten. It has taken a full century for historians to
rediscover Blake's importance and to begin to include him in our
history books.
1
Every student of the history of photography knows the high-speed
images that Eadweard Muybridge and Thomas Eakins made in the 1880s.
Blake's work deserves similar recognition. This essay provides a
concise outline of the nature and importance of his photographic
achievement.
|
1
|
| |
|
Background: Blake and Photography
|
|
|
Francis Blake (1850–1913) possessed an enviable array of scientific,
technical, artistic, and civic talents.
2
For most of his adult life Blake was a very wealthy man with the
time and means to pursue his interests with great sophistication.
He was, in many respects, an archetype of the proper, scientifically
minded, politically conservative Victorian gentleman (
fig. 1
). At the same time, his intelligence, restless curiosity, and profoundly
analytical nature marked him as exceptional.
|
2
|
|
| |
 |
Figure 1. Francis Blake, ca. 1885–90.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake grew up near Boston. He excelled
in mathematics in high school, and at age sixteen he took a position
with the U.S. Coast Survey. His work for the Survey, from 1866 to
1878, gave him a thorough practical training in the science and
technology of the day, especially in astronomical observations and
time-keeping operations essential to the precise determination of
latitude and longitude. After his marriage in 1873, Blake devoted
enormous effort to the construction of a family estate, known as
Keewaydin, in the Boston suburb of Weston.
3
His home included a state-of-the-art machine shop where he began
experimenting with telephony in 1877. His most famous invention,
the "Blake Transmitter," greatly improved the clarity of telephone
communications and immediately became the industry standard. In
1879, he sold the rights to this device to the fledgling Bell Telephone
Company for a generous share of company stock.
|
3
|
|
Photography became a central passion
of Blake's adult life. It is not surprising that the medium fascinated
him. The nineteenth century celebrated photography as one of the
great technological achievements of the era, on a par with the railroad
and telegraph. As both a science and an art, photography combined
traits valued deeply by progressive Victorians: it was at once highly
technical, precisely factual, broadly useful, and fundamentally
democratic.
|
4
|
|
Blake took up photography at a critical
period in the medium's technical and social evolution.
4
Prior to the 1880s, the medium had been largely the province of
the professional. The introduction of the gelatin dry-plate negative
process, however, beginning in the late 1870s, profoundly simplified
the making of photographs. Ready-made plates from the factory eliminated
the labor (and skill) of hand-coating one's own negatives. The ease
of the new processes vastly increased the number of photographers;
for at least a full generation, the amateur ranks grew each year
at an almost exponential rate.
5
At first, these amateurs purchased tripod-mounted cameras in what
were then considered small formats, from 31/4 × 41/4 inches
to 5 × 8 inches. In the mid 1880s, hand cameras came into general
use, liberating photographic picture making from the static perspective
of the tripod. The most famous of these hand-held cameras, George
Eastman's original Kodak, came on the market in 1888. The result
was a genuine revolution in visual culture.
|
5
|
|
These technical and social changes
vastly enlarged the world of photography and fragmented it. As amateurs
took over the simplest documentary tasks, professional work became
increasingly specialized. A third photographic faction arose by
the early 1890s: serious amateurs who used the medium in a self-consciously
artistic way. These artist-photographers sought to make beautiful,
uplifting pictures in the name of poetic expression, rather than
for financial gain. They borrowed heavily from the values and rhetoric
of the established art world and sought to achieve the kind of public
respect that leading painters and sculptors enjoyed. As a result,
a complex network of camera clubs, photographic journals, and public
exhibitions took form between 1885 and 1900.
|
6
|
|
The uniqueness of Blake's place in
the history of photography is underscored by the fact that he did
not fit comfortably into any of these three distinct realms. Blake
recorded his own family life and surroundings—like thousands
of other amateurs—but he did so with an altogether uncommon
precision and seriousness. He applied the highest professional standards
to his work but never used the medium for commercial gain. He participated
in some of the leading artistic exhibitions of the day, but he never
became part of a coherent aesthetic "movement" or philosophy. He
was, in short, an independent and exceptional man who used the medium
in correspondingly original ways.
|
7
|
|
Blake became serious about photography
in 1884, when work on Keewaydin and his experiments in telephony
were winding down. Blake did nothing halfheartedly: he constructed
a lavish photographic laboratory (
fig. 2
) and acquired the finest equipment. His first camera was a 5 ×
8-inch model, but he soon purchased others in the 4 × 5-, 61/2
× 81/2-, and 8 × 10-inch formats. He also made an improvised
portrait studio in his greenhouse, where he recorded such friends
and visitors as the writer William Dean Howells (
fig. 3
). In addition to making regular portraits of family members, Blake
recorded himself in various poses and locations on the estate (
fig. 4
). He also took his cameras on excursions, making pictures at the
family's favorite resort hotel in New Hampshire or at the Illinois
farm of his wife's cousin (
fig. 5
).
|
8
|
|
| |
|
Figure 2. Photography room, ca. 1886–93 (from
original print).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 3. William Dean Howells, 1886 (from originial
print).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 4. Self-portrait on steps at Keewaydin, ca.
1885–89 (from original print).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 5. Windmill, Payson Farm, ca. 1885 (from original
print).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While his choice of subject matter
was not markedly original, the unusual rigor of Blake's vision is
evident in these early photographs. He possessed a precise and subtle
mind; his eye was equally exacting. His photographs of the photographic
laboratory, for example, are at once accurate and elegant—like
his equipment. His meticulous sense of organization is doubly apparent
here: in the precise composition of his images and in the intrinsic
order of what he records. As an engineer and inventor, Blake appreciated
the functional beauty of superbly effective instruments. On a more
intuitive basis, he understood what made a powerful and effective
picture. The key, in both cases, was a sense of directness, precision,
and efficiency.
|
9
|
|
Although Blake pursued photography
strictly from personal interests, he did not work in intellectual
isolation. He remained informed of the issues, concerns, and personalities
of the larger photographic world. In October 1885, he joined the
Society of Amateur Photographers of New York, one of the first and
most progressive of the amateur associations. He also became a member
of the Boston Camera Club and, for several years, served as its
vice president. These affiliations kept him in close contact with
other photographers and fully up-to-date on a wide range of technical
and aesthetic matters. In addition, he subscribed to the most serious
photographic journals, including Anthony's Photographic Bulletin
and Scovill's Weekly Photographic Times.
|
10
|
| |
|
Stopping Time
|
|
|
While all of Blake's photographs have historic and aesthetic appeal,
his greatest contribution to the history of photography, by far,
lies in his high-speed images. Begun in 1886, this work continued
through the late 1890s. It occupied a large portion of his overall
activity in the field and became the basis for his public recognition
as a photographer. Blake's stop-action images of trains, birds,
horses, and athletes combine a still-startling rapidity of vision
with a remarkable sense of pictorial structure. While this work
stemmed logically from Blake's scientific interests, it transcends
any notion of simple, analytical inquiry. Full of whimsy and wonder,
these pictures reveal aspects of reality that are completely invisible
to the naked eye. In profound ways, these pictures convey the radically
inventive potentials of photography and the unexpected complexity
of the real. In both respects, they are of vital importance to the
thought and vision of modernism.
|
11
|
|
The originality of his work is undiminished
by the fact that Blake was not the first or most famous photographer
to make high-speed images. "Instantaneous" photography began in
the early 1870s, with the research of three primary figures: Étienne-Jules
Marey, in France; Ottomar Anschütz, in Prussia; and Eadweard
J. Muybridge, in the United States.
6
Marey achieved public recognition before the others with the release
of his 1873 book La machine animale (published in English
as Animal Mechanism).
|
12
|
|
Muybridge, who remains the best known
of this trio, began his experiments in 1872 under the sponsorship
of California governor Leland Stanford. By 1879, Muybridge's photographs
of trotting and running horses had received international notice.
Viewers of the day were astonished at the odd positions of a running
horse's legs—a seemingly familiar aspect of everyday life
that, in truth, no one had ever seen before. One critic wrote: "All
the former representations of horses in motion are reduced to worthless
frauds by the latest scientific achievement in instantaneous photography."
7
Another, in sheer amazement, said that the sight of Muybridge's
photographs "is enough to turn your brain."
8
After publishing The Attitudes of the Horse in Motion (1881),
Muybridge launched an even more ambitious study of motion under
the sponsorship of the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.
Here he met the painter Thomas Eakins and influenced him to make
his own experiments in high-speed imaging.
9
Between 1884 and 1886, Muybridge exposed over 20,000 plates of human
and animal subjects. To make these sequential images (
fig. 6
), he used two or three banks of twelve cameras each and achieved
individual exposures of nearly 1/2000 of a second. These image-grids
present a curious blend of analysis and abstraction. By breaking
the flow of actual experience into twenty-four or thirty-six discrete
segments, Muybridge's pictures effectively multiply space and fragment
time. These radical images prompted much discussion on the nature
of vision and representation—the difference between "normal"
and "instantaneous" impressions, for example, and the correspondence
between scientific and artistic "truths." The culmination of this
work came in 1887, with the publication of Muybridge's Animal
Locomotion, a massive folio of 781 plates.
|
13
|
|
| |
|
Figure 6. High Jump, 1885, by Eadweard Muybridge (from
original print; Hallmark Photographic Collection).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake knew of Muybridge's work and
clearly was influenced by it. He undertook his own venture into
high-speed photography, however, for different reasons, and it yielded
correspondingly different results. Properly speaking, Muybridge's
photographic technology was strictly a means to an end: he used
it as a tool to analyze human and animal movement. Blake's approach
could be viewed as exactly opposite: he photographed human and animal
subjects in the course of testing and perfecting a new photographic
technology. This is not to diminish the astonishing originality
of Blake's work, but to underscore its difference in motivation
and meaning from that of Muybridge and others.
|
14
|
|
Blake tackled the problem of "instantaneous"
photography at least as early as January 1886. At that time, he
made a series of portraits of friends and family members (
figs. 7
,
8
) caught in the act of laughing.
10
This is an extraordinary, and perhaps even unprecedented, series.
Today, photographic convention assumes that the subject of a portrait
should be depicted smiling. In the nineteenth century, however,
very few people were pictured this way, for two basic reasons: the
relatively long exposures made it difficult to hold a natural looking
smile and, more importantly, nineteenth-century portraiture quite
logically sought to convey a nineteenth-century notion of character.
Victorians believed that one's character could not be revealed in
superficial, highly transitory expressions, but only in a quiet,
enduring manifestation of the inner self. Thus, the typically somber
expressions of nineteenth-century sitters signified dignity, not
dourness.
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Figures 7, 8. (Top to bottom) John G. Hubbard laughing,
1886; Silas Payson laughing, 1886 (from original negatives).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake's photographs of laughers stand
in stark contrast to the unsmiling portrait aesthetic of his time.
They also, however, differ from today's "smile for the camera" convention.
Blake sought to depict not faces that would appear "happy" to modern
tastes but a boldly dynamic sense of spontaneous and highly transitory
action. The faces of Blake's laughers are at once amusing and strange—familiar
visages frozen in distinctly unfamiliar configurations. These are
wonderfully paradoxical pictures. What could be more whimsical than
the scientific effort to depict a laugh? What could be more serious
than the attempt to describe states of being—both physical
and emotional—that are at once so primal and so ephemeral?
|
16
|
|
From this beginning, Blake turned
the bulk of his photographic energy to the problem of making high-speed
images. This work was comprised of two complementary activities:
his research in the design and construction of photographic shutters,
and his use of this technology to create original and compelling
pictures. His cousin John G. Hubbard assisted Blake in most of this
work.
|
17
|
|
Blake undertook a systematic analysis
of the leading shutter designs of the period. His results were so
precise that photographic manufacturers and suppliers sent him lenses
to test and greatly valued his comments and (infrequent) endorsements.
Blake's analytical process was straightforward. He built a measuring
device six feet tall, with increments to a tenth of a foot marked
on the column.
11
A silver ball, 23/8 inches in diameter, was dropped from the top
of the column and photographed during its fall toward a padded box
below. The sun, glinting off the ball's polished surface, produced
a gleaming point of light. In the resulting photographs, this highlight
creates a clear vertical line marking the ball's movement during
the time of exposure. Blake carefully measured the beginning point
and length of this line. He then consulted a specially prepared
table on which he had worked out the time of descent to the nearest
1/10,000 of a second for each hundredth of a foot from 1.00 to 5.59
feet. Since there was always some minor variation in performance
from exposure to exposure, Blake often made three negatives with
a given shutter and averaged the resulting times. These tests became
a familiar sight at Keewaydin, and many family members, including
daughter Agnes, were eager to assist (
fig. 9
).
|
18
|
|
| |
|
Figure 9. Shutter Test (Agnes Blake), ca. 1888 (from
original negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These trials revealed that the average
working speed of commercial shutters was about 3/100 of a second.
While adequate for routine use, this exposure speed proved too slow
to freeze any significant motion. The limitation, Blake realized,
stemmed from a fundamentally flawed design. During the time of exposure,
a mechanical diaphragm (similar in concept to the iris of the human
eye) opened and closed around the central axis of the lens. The
mechanical process was far from instantaneous; in fact, it obscured
half the light that could, in theory, have passed through the lens
in the stated time of exposure. This presented a major obstacle
to any significant reduction in exposure times. Blake realized that
another shutter design, the focal-plane shutter, used briefly in
the early 1860s, offered a far superior alternative.
12
It employed a narrow horizontal slit that moved at a rapid, continuous
speed from top to bottom directly in the front of the camera's film
plane. Given a consistent rate of vertical movement, the actual
time of exposure could be varied by adjusting the width of the opening.
The narrower the opening, the more rapid the effective exposure.
The enormous benefit of the focal-plane shutter lay in the fact
that it transmitted twice as much light as the diaphragm design
in an equivalent exposure time. The only theoretical objection to
the moving slit concept was that it could record a quickly moving
object in distorted form, since the entire negative was not exposed
at once. Blake determined, however, that the rapid movement of the
slit made such distortion unlikely. Moreover, the distorting effects
of a moving subject could be greatly reduced by simply placing the
camera further away.
13
With Hubbard's assistance, Blake constructed a shutter that yielded
effective exposure times of 1/1000 of a second with a 1/5-inch slot,
and 1/2000 of a second with a 1/10-inch opening.
|
19
|
|
Blake used this shutter to make the
remarkable photographs produced over the following few years. His
first subjects included the trains that passed by Keewaydin on the
rail line leading to Boston. One of these images (see cover illustration)
records not only the speeding train but the surrounding landscape
and two laborers on the edge of Blake's estate. This breadth of
view was deliberate (Blake did not crop his original negative at
all in making this print), and to modern eyes it conveys a curiously
surreal sense of juxtaposition and simultaneity.
14
In other exposures of the same subject, Blake cropped his negative
significantly to focus boldly on the train engine alone.
15
These images demonstrate the genuine strangeness of high-speed vision:
a speeding locomotive is frozen forever in a state of suspended
animation, like a fly in amber. It was wonderful and paradoxical
that the rapid movement of a small, handmade device (the focal-plane
shutter) could so dramatically arrest the motion of that large and
powerful machine. As the most advanced and rapid mode of transportation,
the locomotive had profoundly altered cultural notions of time and
space. In images such as this, Blake underscored photography's own
contribution to this ongoing revolution in modern thought.
|
20
|
|
Blake continued his high-speed work
with other subjects close at hand. In an effort to study the precise
dynamics of such simple actions, he photographed himself and various
friends walking and running. Similarly, he made an extended series
of the stride pattern of a running horse (
fig. 10
).
16
His son Benjamin was a willing subject, whether photographed in
mid air, at the apogee of a jump (
fig. 12
), or riding his new bicycle (
fig. 11
).
|
21
|
|
| |
|
Figure 10. 'Cow Pony' at Sharp Canter, ca. 1886–89
(from original lantern slide).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 11. Boy on Bicycle (Benjamin Blake), ca. 1886–89
(from orignal negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 12. Benjamin jumping, ca. 1886-89 (from original
negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 1889, in front of his carriage
house, Blake produced one of his most acclaimed series: his images
of pigeons in flight. Using a new lens acquired from the E. & H.
T. Anthony firm in New York, Blake made many exposures of these
birds (
figs.13
,
14
).
17
It is easy to understand his fascination for this subject. The pigeons
were so quick and unpredictable that the photographer could never
anticipate their ultimate configuration on the photographic plate.
Blake controlled as many variables as possible, of course, by attracting
the birds with strategically placed seeds and then startling them
with a loud noise just prior to making his exposures. Despite this
systematic approach, each of Blake's photographs captures a pictorial
instant that is at once unplanned and invisible to the naked eye.
Blake's devotion to this subject suggests strongly that he was interested
in far more than the simple mechanics of flight. Rather, one could
infer, he was fascinated by the challenge of making interesting
pictures from so unpredictable a subject—finding the
most appropriate graphic form for these small, endlessly unique
explosions of avian activity. Each of these delightfully spontaneous
images hints at the vast pictorial worlds that lie hidden, and otherwise
unseen, within the folds of the fabric of time. They embody the
astonishing idea that things are strangely complex not only at both
ends of the spatial scale (in the vastness of the cosmos and at
the heart of the atom) but also within the apparently simple dimension
of time.
|
22
|
|
| |
|
Figure 13. Pigeons in Flight, ca. 1889 (from original
negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 14. Pigeons in Flight, ca. 1889 (from original
negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figure 15. Golfer, 1898 (from original negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake next turned his camera to a
project that was more analytical than aesthetic in nature. In the
summer of 1891, he made an extensive record of tennis players in
action on the grass court at Keewaydin. Apparently, Blake had been
contacted by James Dwight, a former champion of the sport who was
then writing his book Practical Lawn Tennis. Blake made dozens
of photographs of several renowned players—including Dwight,
Edward L. Hall, Thomas Pettitt, and Richard D. Sears—as they
performed the standard repertoire of strokes (
figs. 16
,
17
). These pictures later illustrated Dwight's textbook (published
in 1893), surely the first of its kind to employ stop-action photographs.
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Figures 16, 17. Tennis players, 1891 (from original
negatives).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Recognition
|
|
|
Blake's high-speed photography received wide recognition and praise
beginning in early 1890. After turning down numerous requests to
discuss his work publicly, Blake consented to lecture on his focal-plane
shutter research at the April 14, 1890, meeting of the Boston Camera
Club. This talk was so well received that he was asked to repeat
it in the fall at the Society of Amateur Photographers of New York
and to prepare it for publication. Within months, Blake's paper
"Photographic Shutters" became the lead article in the February
1891 American Amateur Photographer, accompanied by a fine
photogravure reproduction of one of his pigeon pictures; Anthony's
Photographic Bulletin published it in three installments on
March 14, March 28, and April 25, 1891. Unfortunately, because this
detailed essay—Blake's only public statement on his work—is
purely technical, it provides no sense of his aesthetic or expressive
interests.
|
24
|
In this same period, Blake's photographs
appeared in several prestigious exhibitions. The first major public
showing took place in May 1892 at the Fifth Joint Annual Exhibition,
a cooperative venture of the three leading amateur photographic
organizations of the era: the Photographic Society of Philadelphia,
the Society of Amateur Photographers of New York, and the Boston
Camera Club. The 1892 Joint Exhibition, presented in Boston, included
fortyfive of Blake's prints in several groups, the largest section
devoted to his most recent pictures of tennis players. In addition,
Blake displayed five prints of a cantering pony, two of pigeons
in flight, and one each of the New York Express train and Benjamin
on his bicycle. All the images received enthusiastic praise. The
Boston Record reported the exhibition under the headline
"Blake's Great Feat":
The most wonderful specimens of this art, which its
devotees are so zealously and justly endeavoring to raise above
the plane of a mere mechanical science—such as is too largely
the tendency of professional photography today—to the level
of painting and drawing, are those shown by Francis Blake, and
which as examples of instantaneous, are little short of marvelous.
Mr. Blake is well known as the inventor of the "Blake transmitter"
through which we talk every day over the telephone....
He took up amateur photography
as a diversion and a recreation, and it shortly developed into
a passion. His inventive genius could not be held in check. He
became greatly interested in the wonderful results of the experiments
made by Muybridge, whose instantaneous photographs of animals
in motion, a feat never before accomplished and hitherto regarded
as impossible, created so much talk a few years ago. But it is
commonly conceded that today Francis Blake has eclipsed not only
Muybridge, but Anschütz, in this peculiar department of human
effort, which is at once an art and a science.
18
Blake was one of only twelve photographers in the exhibition
to be awarded a medal for his work.
|
25
|
A few months later, Blake was invited
to show this group of pictures again in the photographic section
of the Eighteenth Triennial Exhibition of the Massachusetts Charitable
Mechanic Association. The jurors awarded him a silver medal for
his achievement. The almost surreal nature of these pictures is
underscored by the jury's official comment, an amusing combination
of sober reportage and whimsical speculation:
Mr. Blake's exhibit is worthy of special mention from
a scientific point of view, showing the wonderful possibilities
of photography in the taking of express trains going at full speed,
horses running, birds flying, etc., etc. Next we may look for
the photographing of persons at a distance, speech, and possibly
our very thoughts. Some of Mr. Blake's pictures were made in the
one-thousandth part of a second.
19
Concurrent with the Mechanic Association show in Boston,
Blake sent a significant entry to the fall 1892 exhibition of the
Photographic Society of Great Britain, in London. He also submitted
three instantaneous studies to the Sixth Annual Exhibit of the Photographic
Society of Philadelphia, in April 1893, for which he received another
silver medal.
|
26
|
|
This 1893 exhibition appears to mark
the effective end of Blake's exhibition career. Although he continued
to receive invitations to show his photographs and requests for
articles, there is little evidence that Blake responded to these
inquiries. He still pursued the use of high-speed photography, but
at a much more leisurely pace than before. In 1898, for example,
he made a series of golfers in action (
fig. 15
). Other than this group, however, his photographic production after
1891 appears to have been quite modest.
|
27
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Blake's Legacy
|
|
|
Although it may seem strange today, Blake's withdrawal from the
public realm of photography at the moment of his greatest success
was actually wholly in character. A highly self-motivated man, Blake
had taken up the medium strictly for his own intellectual and artistic
pleasure. A proudly independent person—with an almost aristocratic
sense of privilege and position—Blake took some real, but
distinctly limited, pleasure in the attention of strangers. This
qualified pleasure may well have been tempered by the unwanted demands
on his time and energy that public exposure of his work invited.
Further, the fastidious Blake probably grew impatient with the casual
treatment of his pictures in the loosely organized shows of the
day.
|
28
|
|
While brief, Blake's public activity
in photography occurred at an important period in the medium's artistic
development. As a critic of Blake's work had noted in 1892, photography
was seen as both a science and an art—an inherently unstable
combination of traits. From the mid 1880s to the turn of the new
century, endless debate took place in photographic circles on the
nature and potentials of the medium. The central question was one
of enormous importance: did the art of photography lie in the unique
nature (and limitations) of its technology or in the endless fertility
of the human imagination? Was it a medium of prose or poetry, substance
or spirit, the real or the ideal? The answer, as the medium's subsequent
history has clearly demonstrated, is "both" and "all of the above."
These apparently dichotomous positions in fact represent the ends
of photography's creative spectrum, a long continuum from "pure"
fact to "pure" invention.
|
29
|
|
As it happened, the dominant photographic
aesthetic of the 1890s was an increasingly subjective, idealizing
one. Leading artistic photographers employed soft-focus techniques,
textured printing papers, and hand-manipulated negatives to achieve
effects that were clearly expressive rather than merely descriptive.
Contemporaries understood photographs as art only to the degree
that an image revealed "the impress of the mind."
20
As a leading art photographer stated in 1892, "A photograph gives
us the naked truth, which has to be clothed by the imagination."
21
This artistic movement, known as "Pictorialism," powerfully influenced
the vision of an entire artistic generation. Needless to say, Blake's
work did not conform to this aesthetic. In contrast to the Pictorialist
reverence for the ideas of timelessness, subjectivity, and a generic
sense of the "ideal," Blake's photographs were explicitly about
time, scientific analysis, and the wonder of the real. While Pictorialists
strove to override the camera's inherent objectivity, Blake celebrated
photography's precise, mechanical nature.
|
30
|
|
The stylistic tide would turn, of
course, and a later generation would redefine the art of photography
in accordance with—rather than in opposition to—its
basic optical-mechanical means. New, modernist permutations of an
essentially realist aesthetic were firmly in place by the late 1920s
and early 1930s, with the influence of the American purist movement
and the European "New Vision" aesthetic. The first of these, typified
by the work of photographers such as Edward Weston, Paul Strand,
and Charles Sheeler, advocated a direct, unmanipulated use of the
medium. While they made photographs rather different from those
of Blake, the purists held a similar reverence for the idea of the
camera as optical machine. The "New Vision" movement—exemplified
by figures such as Man Ray and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy—celebrated
photography as a radically modern and flexible imaging technology.
The result was the artistic use of cameraless images, unconventional
angles of view, unusually fast or slow exposures, and an aesthetic
appreciation for scientific or utilitarian photographs not originally
created as art. This approach united a rigorously experimental approach
with a playful embrace of chance and the unexpected. While these
artists, too, used methods different from Blake's, they would have
appreciated the originality, wit, and strangeness of his images.
|
31
|
|
By the 1930s, however, precious few
remembered Blake's pictures—they had simply been out of public
view too long. Although the first modern photographic history books
were published in this period, none mentioned Blake.
22
In addition, a new generation of high-speed photographers was achieving
effective exposure times (thanks to the invention of the stroboscopic
flash) that made late-nineteenth-century work seem positively quaint.
The best known of this group, Dr. Harold E. Edgerton of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, produced exposures of one-millionth of
a second, or even less, of all manner of animal and mechanical motion.
23
|
32
|
|
Given all the benefits of hindsight,
what is the significance of Blake's photography? From an art-historical
point of view, its importance in large measure stems from the way
it embodies late-nineteenth-century notions of realism, while anticipating
the purist and "New Vision" photographic aesthetics of the 1920s
and 1930s. Blake's photographs appear far more "modern" and "photographic"
to us today than any of the classic Pictorialist works made at the
turn of the century. Boldness and clarity are now seen as modernist
virtues, while romantic idealization and impressionistic softness
most typically register as mere sentiment, nostalgia.
|
33
|
The tension between these two aesthetic
approaches—realism and idealism—lay at the heart of
late-nineteenth-century creative thought. Blake's friend William
Dean Howells was a leader in the literary realist movement. Howells
stressed the importance of facts, close observation, and the meaning
inherent in seemingly commonplace subjects. He applauded the objectivity
of science and appreciated the "impartial fidelity of the photograph."
24
Critics, in turn, found his novels vulgar and trivial and bereft
of any ability to uplift or idealize. In response to such criticism,
Howells quoted Ralph Waldo Emerson:
I ask not for the great, the remote, the romantic....
I embrace the common; I sit at the feet of the familiar and the
low.... Man is surprised to find that things near are not less
beautiful and wondrous than things remote.... The perception of
the worth of the vulgar is fruitful in discoveries.... The foolish
man wonders at the unusual, but the wise man at the usual.
25
Blake, like Emerson and Howells, was a firm believer in
the value of fact and in the essential mystery of common things.
The antirealist currents of the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries had to subside before these values, in updated form, could
again rise to artistic dominance.
|
34
|
|
Ultimately, Blake's photographs feel
profoundly, prototypically modern. While created in the late 1880s,
these pictures anticipate the most memorable creative work produced
a full generation or more later. Disdaining the late-Victorian trappings
of allegory and soft-focus symbolism, Blake photographed the most
common, everyday things: laughter, birds, trains, a bicycle rider.
To these subjects he applied an original artistic vision based on
a boldly modern understanding of both time and the potentials of
photography.
|
35
|
|
As I have tried to stress, something
in Blake's work—a critical element of artistry, pleasure,
and experimentation—transcends the strictly analytical. An
odd and genuinely astonishing image in the Blake archive underscores
this trait (
fig. 18
). Blake heated the glass negative of this scene—a playful
record of two friends jumping in the air—until the emulsion
began to melt and run toward the bottom of the plate. The resulting
image is exuberantly surreal: the distorted figures hover in the
air, with their hats floating above them, over a wildly undulating
landscape. While unusual in Blake's production, this image exemplifies
the profoundly inventive spirit of his overall activity in photography.
This picture is, at once, an expression of pure pleasure and of
sober technical experimentation. Moreover, it powerfully conveys
the essential duality of the photographic process: its ability to
both record and invent visual worlds. This image, like most of Blake's
other pictures, reveals a "reality" otherwise invisible to the naked
eye. Only photography could create such visions, and Blake understood
and relished this power.
|
36
|
|
| |
|
Figure 18. Distortion, ca. 1886–89 (from original
negative).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After nearly a century of neglect,
Blake's place in the history of photography now seems secure. Gifted
with a profoundly original mind, he used the camera to explore both
time itself and the graphic possibilities of picture making. A perfect
synthesis of analysis and intuition, his work represents a photographic
vision that owes nothing to the influence of other mediums. By weaving
Blake back into our history books, we complicate and revitalize
a period that we thought we knew. This is enormously invigorating.
The physical motion that Blake stilled in his pictures is returned
to us in poetic form, as a delightful kind of conceptual energy.
|
37
|
|
KEITH F. DAVIS, Fine Art Programs Director, Hallmark
Cards, Inc., Kansas City, Mo., has published many books on photography,
most recently, An American Century of Photography: From Dryplate
to Digital, The Hallmark Photographic Collection (2d ed.,
1999).
NOTES
1. George R. Rinhart,
the noted collector and historian of photography, deserves credit
for the modern rediscovery of Blake's work. Fascinated by a reproduction
of one of Blake's pigeon pictures in an 1891 issue of American
Amateur Photographer, Rinhart located Blake's descendants
and purchased the vintage prints in their possession. The first
publication of Blake's work in recent years (and perhaps in the
entire twentieth century!) appeared in Thomas Weston Fels, O Say
Can You See: American Photographs, 1839–1939. One Hundred
Years of American Photographs from the George R. Rinhart Collection
(Cambridge, Mass., 1989). Two of Blake's high-speed images (Pigeons
in Flight and Man on Bicycle) were included in this
book (pp. 66–67) and in the accompanying exhibition. The
first of these images was subsequently included (p. 232) in Michel
Frizot, A New History of Photography (Koln, 1994). I included
this same work (p. 53) and a second pigeon image (p. 16) in my
An American Century of Photography: From Dry-Plate to Digital,
The Hallmark Photographic Collection (Kansas City, 1995).
It was published again (p. 74), with Engine of the New York
Express (p. 18), in An American Century of Photography:
From Dry-Plate to Digital, The Hallmark Photographic Collection,
2d rev. ed. (Kansas City, 1999). To my knowledge, these are the
only histories of photography to date to include Blake. The Massachusetts
Historical Society holds the largest collection of Blake photographs
as part of its voluminous Blake archive. The only other repositories
of Blake's original prints are the Rinhart Collection, the Hallmark
Photographic Collection, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Unless
otherwise indicated, all images in this essay are from the Francis
Blake collection at the Massachusetts Historical Society (hereafter
MHS).
2. The basic facts
of Blake's life and work are derived from several sources, but
primarily from Elton W. Hall's unpublished manuscript Francis
Blake: 1850–1913 (1997), a monumental compilation based
on the even more monumental contents of the Francis Blake Papers
at the MHS. I have been through much of this archive myself and
have drawn my own conclusions on the importance of certain episodes,
achievements, and ideas. In addition, useful short biographical
sketches of Blake appear in the standard biographical reference
works. See, for example, his entry in the National Cyclopedia
of American Biography (New York, 1955), 22:25–26.
3. This house, which
was demolished some years ago, stood at the present intersection
of the Massachusetts Turnpike and Route 128.
4. For a more detailed
overview of this subject, see chapter 1, "A Reluctant Modernism,
1885–1915," of my An American Century of Photography
(1999).
5. The rapid spread
of interest in photography in American society worked its way,
in essence, down the economic ladder. In the early 1880s, the
process of photography was enormously simplified, but the equipment
was still relatively expensive. Thus, most of these early amateurs
were members of the upper and upper-middle classes. By 1900, however,
when the Kodak Brownie camera was introduced (priced at only one
dollar), the process was open to all but the poorest Americans.
6. Numerous studies
of Muybridge are available, including Muybridge's Complete
Human and Animal Locomotion (New York, 1979). For an excellent
survey of Marey's career, see Marta Braun, Picturing Time:
The Work of Étienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904) (Chicago,
1992). For an early report of Anschütz's work in the American
photographic press, see Philadelphia Photographer 23(Nov.
20, 1886):686–688.
7.California Spirit
of the Times May 8, 1880; reprinted in Photography: Essays
& Images, ed. Beaumont Newhall (New York, 1980), 142.
8.Philadelphia
Photographer 16 (Jan. 1879):22.
9. Eakins made about
two dozen such images in 1884–1885. See Susan Danly and
Cheryl Leibold, Eakins and the Photograph (Washington,
D.C., 1994).
10. Elizabeth Blake,
diary, Jan. 27, 1886, Francis Blake Papers, MHS.
11. For Blake's
description of this work, see his article "Photographic Shutters,"
published in both American Amateur Photographer 3 (Feb.
1891):67–73; and Anthony's Photographic Bulletin
22 (Mar. 14, 1891):144–146, (Mar. 28, 1891):174–177,
and (Apr. 25, 1891):234–236.
12. Blake stated
in the above article that he first read about this design in Thomas
Sutton's Dictionary of Photography (1867).
13. As Blake wrote
in "Photographic Shutters": "The possibility of distortion may
be eliminated by setting up the camera at such a distance from
the moving object that the angular value of its image on the sensitive
plate shall be equal to or slightly less than the width of the
shutter slot."
14. One cannot help
but think of such later modernist icons as André Kertész's
Meudon, 1928.
15. For example,
see Engine of the New York Express. Speed: 48 miles an hour,
reproduced (from one of Blake's own vintage prints) on page 18
of my An American Century of Photography (1999). The original
negative of this image, in the Blake archive of the MHS, presents
a considerably wider view.
16. This reproduction
is taken from Blake's lantern slide. To make his prints and lantern
slides of this series, Blake cropped his original negatives considerably
to focus solely on the horse and rider.
17. To achieve the
sharpest images possible, Blake placed his camera at some distance
from his subjects. When these negatives were enlarged to make
exhibition prints, he usually cropped them significantly. For
example, compare the viewpoint of these images (modern prints,
made full-frame from Blake's original negatives in the MHS) with
the noticeably tighter view of one of Blake's vintage exhibition
prints from this series, reproduced on page 74 of my An American
Century of Photography (1999).
18.Boston Record,
May 7, 1892.
19. This quotation
and a full listing of Blake's subjects are included in Report
of the Eighteenth Triennial Exhibition of the Massachusetts Charitable
Association held ... October and November, 1892 (Boston,
1893), 175–176, 182. It is reported here that Blake showed
36 views of tennis players, 5 views of 'Cow Pony' at Sharp
Canter, 2 views of Pigeons in Flight, and single prints
of Boy on Bicycle and Engine of the New York Express.
Speed, 48 miles an hour. My thanks to Chris Steele for originally
bringing this reference to my attention, and for his invaluable
assistance in the first stages of this research.
20.Report of
the Eighteenth Triennial Exhibition, 229.
21. Frank M. Sutcliffe,
"How to Look at Photographs," Wilson's Photographic Magazine
29(Oct. 15, 1892):621.
22. The most significant
of these include Beaumont Newhall, Photography: A Short Critical
History (New York, 1938); Robert Taft, Photography and
the American Scene: A Social History, 1839–1889 (New
York, 1938); and Erich Stenger, The History of Photography
(Easton, Pa., 1939). Newhall's history went through three subsequent
editions (through 1982); none mention Blake.
23. Many books have
been written on this work, beginning with Harold E. Edgerton and
James R. Killian, Jr., Flash! Seeing the Unseen by Ultra High-Speed
Photography (Boston, 1939).
24. William Dean
Howells, "A Case in Point," Literature (Mar. 24, 1899):15.
On this general theme, see for instance Miles Orvell, The Real
Thing: Imitation and Authenticity in American Thought and Culture,
1880–1940 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1989); and David E. Shi,
Facing Facts: Realism in American Thought and Culture, 1850–1920
(New York, 1995).
25. William Dean
Howells, Criticism and Fiction and Other Essays, ed. Clara
Marburg Kirk and Rudolph Kirk (New York, 1959), 40.
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|