|
|
|
Book Review
Michael S. Foldy, The Trials of Oscar Wilde: Deviance,
Morality, and Late-Victorian Society, New Haven: Yale University Press,
1997. Pp. xv + 206. Price $30.00 (ISBN 0-300-07122-4).
|
This is a book that promises a good deal more
than it delivers. It is, however, a work very au courant
in light of recent interest in Oscar Wilde's personal life and artistic
disposition. Foldy's stated purpose is to reconstruct Wilde as the
symbol he was in 1895 and also to reconstruct the popular consciousness
that understood that symbol. The first two chapters of the book
deal with the details of the three trials, the testimony of the
principals, and the legal issues involved in the litigation. Wilde's
testimony before the court was hardly exculpatory, as during the
cross-examination in the first trial he was immediately caught lying
about his age. Edward Carson, defending the Marquess of Queensberry
against the charge of publishing a defamatory libel, first asked
questions about Wilde's artistic ideas and literary works. Quick-witted,
droll, and able to give obscure answers to straightforward questions,
Wilde was too clever by half in his attempts to explain his views
on art and aesthetics. His "inappropriate whimsicality" (9) contrasted
poorly with the gravity of the charges that he had brought before
the court. However, it was Carson's announcement of a series of
witnesses prepared to testify as to the details of their relationships
with Wilde that caused the withdrawal of the prosecution by Sir
Edward Clarke, who represented Wilde. The subsequent arrest and
trials for committing "acts of gross indecency" under the Criminal
Law Amendment Act seemed to be in some ways a formality before the
sentencing (31). The evidence was equally sensational and damning. |
1
|
|
The third chapter explores press
coverage and the reaction of the Victorian public. The press had
a wonderful time with the trialsenthusiastically reporting
the ghastly details and analyzing the moral implications for the
nation. There seemed to be little sympathy for Wilde's situation,
and with his works being pulled off the shelves and his plays quietly
closing, one journal even suggested that Wilde commit suicide to
save society the "pain and embarrassment of another trial" (54).
|
2
|
|
In the final three chapters
of the work, the author explores the intellectual and emotional
atmosphere of the times in the context of the terms "heterosexism"
and "homophobia." Foldy posits that the Wilde trials provided a
forum and point of reference for discussion of the notions of decadence,
degeneration, and same-sex passion, ideas that were so controversial
near the turn of the twentieth century. Using Wilde's description
of his art and philosophy of aesthetics, Foldy attempts to explain
Wilde's sexuality within the framework of his metaphysics. Finally,
the author's summation of Wilde and his place in history is wonderfully
readable and cogent. |
3
|
|
One must be taken aback by Foldy's
discussion of the Marquess of Queensberry and the prime minister,
Lord Rosebery, vis à vis Oscar Wilde. Foldy readily
admits there is no indication of any connection between Wilde and
Rosebery and that there is also no evidence of Rosebery being involved
in a homosexual relationship with Queensberry's oldest son, Francis
Archibald Douglas, Viscount Drumlanrig, who was killed in a shooting
accident in 1894. Having no evidence with which to continue this
thread, Foldy proceeds to fabricate a convoluted tale of blackmail,
influence, and murder. This is fantastic, indeed. |
4
|
|
What Foldy might
have taken into greater account was Queensberry's troublesome personality.
The Marquess was not merely a difficult character, but a mischief-maker
within his own family, a loose cannon in society, and a man who
found fault with everyone (except himself). Had it not been for
his title, he likely would have been locked up. The larger question,
which Foldy does not address, is why Oscar Wilde felt compelled
to bring the suit against the Marquess of Queensberry for having
published that defamatory libel. Foldy explains that Wilde's friends
were anxious that he not bring the suit, and they informed him that
public opinion seemed to be against him. Nevertheless, Wilde continued
and set in motion the legal mechanisms which eventually brought
him to prison. |
5
|
|
The endnotes for this work are
ample and informative, with an extensive bibliography, and an adequate
index. The impact of the book would have been improved with the
inclusion of photographs of the principles, especially since Wilde's
physiognomy and style figured largely in the trials. |
6
|
|
|
Deborah Wiggins
|
|
South Plains College
|
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for
personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce,
publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or
sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any
way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part
without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|