|
|
|
Book Review
Iain McCalman, Alexander Cook and Andrew Reeves (eds),
Gold: Forgotten Histories and Lost Artefacts of Australia,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. pp. xiv + 344. $49.95 cloth;
Robyn Annear, Nothing But Gold: the Diggers of 1852,
Text, Melbourne, 1999. pp. x + 329. $19.70 paper.
| The One Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary
of Gold Discovery in Australia caused a flurry of publishing. The
long-desired National Museum of Australia chose to celebrate the
gold rushes in its opening exhibition. A lavish book, Gold: Forgotten
Histories and Lost Objects, was produced by the Museum to mark
the occasion, presenting a collection of essays that re-assess the
traditional narrative of progress in relation to the
contribution of the gold rushes to Australian history. There is
a strong visual element to the book, with many art-works reproduced
in colour. The marbled-gold cover suggests an opulent work, and
the quality of the essays live up to that impression. |
1
|
| A very different
work is Robyn Annears racy popular history, Nothing But
Gold. This was cannily produced before the gold anniversary,
and quickly became an essential tool for getting under the skin
of an alluvial miner of the 1850s. Given that many Australians claim
an ancestor who fossicked on the Victorian goldfields, this book
is instantly appealing to family historians. It uses personal accounts,
diaries and the authors own oral history to great effect.
Its no-nonsense paperback format makes it an entertaining companion
for the traveller seeking to re-enter the past. Both books attempt
to give a place to those who have been ignored in many earlier histories
of gold. Women feature strongly in both. Annear gives voice to women
through their diaries, and the same diaries are used by Margaret
Anderson in her essay. Susan Lawrences contribution uses archaeological
evidence to piece together the social history of families following
the rushes to rugged bush locations. |
2
|
|
The editors of the Gold collection
pose a challenging question. They ask to what extent the gold
story was a myth developed by the radical nationalists from the
1890s, idealising the digger and the Eureka uprising through the
words of literary figures like Henry Lawson and Victor Daley.
Some of the authors in this collection examine the obverse of
the myth the racism and sexism of the times, the economic
exploitation of workers, and the environmental degradation. The
contributors illustrate the value of giving due weight to
the increasingly unfashionable conception of class interest.
Ann Curthoys exposes the vicious racism of the goldfields, vividly
illustrated at the Lambing Flat riot in 1861, while Charles Fahey
delves into the experiences of the pioneering miners union
in Bendigo. The geographic coverage is wide, with all states of
Australia and also Papua-New Guinea receiving attention.
|
3
|
| As the collection
was commissioned through the National Museum, there is a strong
emphasis on material culture, and the chapters that dealt with recently
unearthed sketches and goldfields jewellery were particularly
illuminating. The two books serve very different purposes and appeal
to different audiences. The National Museums collection of
essays is a scholarly collection, indispensable for its contribution
to the historiography of gold. Annears lively sketch of 1852
brings the era to smelly, noisy, uncomfortable and exciting life,
a bubbly narrative based on good historical research. |
4
|
|
| University of Ballarat |
ANNE BEGGS SUNTER
|
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for
personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce,
publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or
sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any
way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part
without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|