|
|
|
Book Review
Jan Gothard, Blue China: Single Female Migration to Colonial Australia
, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 2001. pp. xiii + 298. $44.95
paper.
| Labour historians will welcome Jan Gothard's
new book, Blue China . It documents, in fascinating detail,
the experiences of working-class women who reached Australia as
assisted migrants in the second half of the nineteenth century.
Some 20 years ago now, A.J. Hammerton's pathbreaking study, Emigrant
Gentlewomen: Genteel Poverty and Female Emigration, 1830-1914, first
traced the interface of women's urgent needs for remunerative employment,
Britain's promotion of its national and imperial interests and female
reformers' interventions on behalf of their sex. Hammerton was one
of the earliest historians to show that despite easy assumptions
about the scarcity of sources for women's history, a wealth of rich
detail awaited the resourceful scholar of the area. Gothard faced
an equally challenging task in her search given the poorer and less
well educated group on which she focused. Blue China demonstrates
how well she has accomplished her undertaking, as her sensitively
and evocatively developed narrative unfolds. |
1
|
| Women, a Canadian
emigration official suggested in the 1880s, were like blue china:
'very valuable when sound, but very worthless when damaged or broken'.
Gothard captures the official anxieties about migrant women's conduct
that drove governments and migration agents, some middle-class women
included, to assume, unabashed, the right to dominate and control
the lives of any migrant woman as they could of recipients of charity.
They sought to channel the women's behaviour and destinations along
paths designed by their elders and betters to maximise their eventual
usefulness to the middle class. But through well-judged use of her
sources Gothard is able to juxtapose against their policies the
women's own intentions. Her narrative explores the tension between
choice, agency and submission in these women's lives. |
2
|
| Numbers of
historians have documented the enormous demand in the Australian
colonies for domestic servants. This was caused by a severe imbalance
of the sexes in the settler population and the high marriage rates
for white women that prevailed. It was a shortage that was exacerbated
by the waged alternatives to domestic service that became available
as the century progressed. Only a privileged few could hope to employ
a governess for their young, but many white women yearned for the
assistance of a servant who could clean, cook and care for young
children at the same time. There is an intersection here between
race and gender politics. In colonies such as India and South Africa,
indigenous people were pressed into service to meet white peoples
domestic needs. Australian colonists (particularly in urban areas)
had fewer indigenous people to push into such service. Colonial
governments had no other choice than to pay out good money to attract
young women to the colonies for such work, but pay they did, and
their advertisements had effect: despite the wrench from home and
kin, some 90,000 women who were unlikely to have otherwise reached
Australia migrated under the scheme to start lives in this distant
working environment. In an endeavour to which Paula Hamilton in
particular has significantly contributed, Gothard attempted to break
down historical stereotypes about these domestic workers who have
often been readily characterised in simplistic and ultimately demeaning
ways. |
3
|
| In recent
decades, illuminating studies of convict women have shown the value
of the style of critical analysis and revisionist interpretation
that Gothard employs. In the absence of any substantial archive
of personal papers, she shows considerable resourcefulness in her
use of letters, diaries and memoirs. These are set beside drier
official records: the relevant government publications, reports
of select committee inquiries and colonial debates. Gothard shows
how participants in assisted migration nurtured diverse motives
for their decision to migrate, sustained a variety of expectations
of the rewards that would ensue and responded individually to outcomes.
A complex picture emerges: women did not rush to join the scheme
in the hopes of a marriage partner (though this was not an uncommon
result) but actively sought the steady reasonably paid work that
they were promised. The cheapness of the passage was all-important
and often they chose Australia because they wished to join a family
member or friend who was already in the colony. |
4
|
| A striking
theme of Gothard's study is the stringency of the regime of control
to which the women migrants were subjected once they accepted financial
assistance from the colonial state, a control that was tempered
more by their carers inefficiency and the women's own strategies
of evasion than the authorities goals. Admittedly it was only for
a brief period of the women's lives, but even so it was astonishing
how much these women's civil rights were compromised. This control
included surveillance of their sexual conduct from the minute they
reached the depot and continued for the length of the passage and
on arrival in the colony, as officials and their employees strove
to keep the women from the presence of supposedly predatory men.
Even a wish to attend an evening church service was suspect! Moreover,
despite the women's clearly expressed wishes to go to a particular
colony, the colonial authorities could ride roughshod over their
protests and divide sisters who migrated together or prevent reunions
in the colonies as they willed. Officials, in addition, showed no
compunction about hiding from the women the higher wages they might
have commanded on the free market, in the interests of providing
middle-class households with the cheapest possible labour. It was
difficult to trace many of the women past their first assignments
to observe their fate after this inauspicious start, but considerable
hardship in all probability awaited them in the kitchens of the
colonies. |
5
|
| In Blue
China Jan Gothard has made an important contribution to our
knowledge. She shows how British and colonial authorities matched
Britain's wish to export some of its excess population with the
economic and household needs of its southern colonies. In doing
so, she illuminates the lives of a significant group of nineteenth-century
British migrant workers, breaking down accepted understandings to
set in place a more nuanced history. We are indebted to Gothard
for her scholarship and her eminently readable narrative. This book
deserves to take its place in the forefront of studies of women
in colonial labour history. |
6
|
|
| University of Melbourne |
PATRICIA GRIMSHAW
|
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for
personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce,
publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or
sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any
way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part
without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|