|
|
|
Book Review
Marilyn Dodkin, Brothers: Eight Leaders of the Labor Council of
New South Wales, UNSW Press, Sydney, 2001. pp. x + 297. $39.95 paper.
| Having worked for a federal Labor politician
and for a major trade union as well as being a political historian,
Marilyn Dodkin writes about the labour movement from the perspective
of an 'insider'. She describes her study, Brothers, as being
'the political biography of eight men who led [NSW] Labor Council
from 1946 to 2001' (p. 2). The cover illustrationa baton being
passed from the hand of one runner to othersuggests a theme
of the book, the concept of succession, usually smooth and ordered.
In one sense, the central 'character' of the book, therefore, is
not any of the biographical subjects but the organisation for which
they worked, the NSW Labor Council. |
1
|
| Whether a
'political biography' or a study of the NSW Labor Council during
the second half of the twentieth century, however, Brothers has
several shortcomings. Firstly, a biographyeven one devoted
to a political, rather than a personal, lifeshould reveal
enough about the subject to allow the reader to feel at least a
little acquainted with him (or her). Examples of good political
biography include Crisp's study of Ben Chifley and Lloyd Ross' work
on John Curtin. Although Dodkin has allotted only a chapter or two
for each subject, one feels that the paucity of personal details
should have been remediedespecially in the case of Ducker
to whom Dodkin refers as a 'colossus'. In fact, although the author
interviewed Ducker, there are a number of instances in the chapters
devoted to him where questions that he might easily have clarified
remain obscurein particular the circumstances surrounding
his 'breakdown' in 1977 (p. 147). If Ducker did not wish to discuss
this matter, then perhaps a footnote should have been added indicating
that this was the case. |
2
|
| As a study
of the Labor Council, the book lacks an adequate introduction to
the pre-1946 history and an explanation of the relationship between
the Council and the ALP. This relationship was particularly interesting
to this reviewer and I should have liked to see it discussed in
more detail. For example, on p. 17, we are told that 'traditionally,
the president's vacancy would have been filled by the next in line'.
How did this 'tradition' arise? Is the close relationship between
the ALP (NSW Branch) and the Labor Council similar to that in other
states, or different? Did it, for example, arise in the old Australian
Labor Federation (ALF) days? In Western Australia, for example,
the ALF model of a joint industrial and political body was adopted
at the beginning of the twentieth century and retained until 1963.
|
3
|
| Dodkin could
have produced more analysis and comparison of the leadership styles
and contributions of the eight leaders. This occurs to some extent
in the shorter (and later) chapters devoted to more recent leaders,
but there is certainly scope for a comparative chapter, reflecting
on the changes in both internal and external circumstances. For
example, the author regards Michael Eason as being 'not as successful'
as his fellow Labor Council leaders (p. 4). This was due partly
to his somewhat tendentious relations with the ALP and the unionswho
regarded him as being too friendly with the Griener Governmentand
to the financial difficulties that the Council faced over the purchase
of Centenary House (p. 196-8). The table on p. 202, designed to
illustrate decreasing support for Eason in elections for the office
of Council Secretary, does not, in fact do so. Despite his problems
with the ALP and the financial difficulties mentioned above, Easson
was re-elected unopposed to the position in 1992, unlike Unsworth
who gained only 74 per cent of the vote in his second election (p.
202). |
4
|
| Despite these
criticisms, however, I believe that Dodkin's book will occupy a
useful place on the shelves of labour historians (myself included).
Because it is specific to the careers of these eight men, it contains
considerably detailed accounts of some of the major events of their
terms in office. An example is the description of Ducker's involvement
in ALP factional struggles in the early 1970s, (pp. 137 ff). Of
interest, too, is the information about the early careers of men
who would later play important roles in the NSW ALP. Bob Carr began
his career as 'a Young Labor right-wing activist employed as an
education and publicity officer', whilst Barrie Unsworth was a organiser
for the Labor Council (p. 76). |
5
|
| In some ways,
too, the history of the Labor Council, as seen through the changes
in its leadership, are a microcosm of the labour movement in Australia
in the later twentieth century, although the author has not made
this point. The entry of a few women to the leadershipalthough
not to the topmost positions; the 1998 election of Michael Costa,
the first Secretary to come from a non-English speaking background;
and the fact that Easson, Sams and Costa (the last three Labor Council
Secretaries in Dodkin's book) were all tertiary educated, were signs
of the changing face of Australian Labor. Leadership styles changed,
too. Dodkin depicts Kenny and Ducker as men who showed little willingness
to share their power until it was forced on them by circumstances
beyond their control: death in Kenny's case and health breakdown
in Ducker s. The leadership styles of later Secretaries, however,
are described as invoking 'consensus' (MacBean); highlighting 'issues
not factions' (Easson), and regenerating the union movement (Sams).
Some of these latter-day Secretaries showed an independence from
the ALP that was entirely absent in earlier leaders. These changes
could have been discussed in more detail, together with some sense
of the direction that the Labor Council appears to be taking in
the twenty-first century, thus resulting in a more penetrating study.
|
6
|
|
| Curtin University |
BOBBIE OLIVER
|
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for
personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce,
publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or
sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any
way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part
without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|