You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Journal of World History online. About 368 words from this article are provided below; about 12440 words remain.
 
If you are a subscriber to the Journal of World History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of World History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of World History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Maghan Keita | Africans and Asians: Historiography and the Long View of Global Interaction | Journal of World History, 16.1 | The History Cooperative
16.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
Journal of World History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Africans and Asians: Historiography and the Long View of Global Interaction


MAGHAN KEITA
Villanova University




The dispersion of Africans is a phenomenon of the modern world.
—Kilson and Rotberg1



The historian who looks eastward, confronting the vast movement of men and women across Asia will be taken for granted.2
—George Shepperson



The black man is lord of the people of the East.3
—Al-Baladhuri


   

Race, Epistemology, and Historiography

 
Westerners have a tendency to view interaction among the world's various peoples as a marker of the modern age. This implies that interaction across the globe is a modern phenomenon given primarily to Westerners. Inherent in this tendency is the inability of non-Westerners and those also deemed un-modern to participate in this interaction. 1
      Even when this interaction occurs within modern time and space, most of us have little critical regard for what we view. For instance, what are the levels of African and Asian interaction in the "New World"? How is this interaction interpreted? What are its nuances and implications? What should we make of an eighteenth-century Mexican slave from "Bengal" who sues for his freedom and that of his wife, "una creola negra"? Or how is Alberto Fujimori understood in a Peru once mined by African slaves? 2
      The exigencies of modern racial construction have erected paradigms that are accepted globally and that militate against critical examination of African and Asian interaction. In that regard, modern racialized hierarchies preclude Africans and Asians, as well as other interested parties, from making such inquiries. If this is true of modern analysis and the histories that it spawns, the issue of the histories that precede the modern era written by those of us who consider ourselves "Western" or modern—even postmodern—appear to be more problematic. 3
      This is particularly true in the examination of Africans and people of African descent. The vision imposed on Africans is temporally and geographically fixed: movement to the western hemisphere in the wake of the Columbian voyages. The vehicle, and therefore, the sociopolitical economic icon of this experience is the slave ship. It is here that the histories of Africa, Africans, and peoples of African descent are "known." . . .

There are about 12440 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.