|
|
|
REVIEWS
SECTION 2
URBAN THEMES
| Street Meeting: Multiethnic Neighborhoods in Early Twentieth-Century Los Angeles. By MarkWild (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. xi plus 298 pp.).
|
| Jane Jacobs referred to Los Angeles in 1961 as "an extreme example of a metropolis with little public life."1 Mark Wild's Street Meeting makes it clear that this was not always the case. Wild focuses on a number of ethnically diverse neighborhoods of Los Angeles in the first four decades of the twentieth century, and argues that areas such as Chinatown, Little Tokyo, Sonoratown, Boyle Heights, Lincoln Heights, Belvedere, the Market District and South Central were home to a vibrant culture of cross-ethnic and cross-racial interactions, ranging from children's play to teenage romances to adult politics.Wild's work is an ambitious attempt to transcend the ethnic boundaries that have limited the works of many urban social historians. At times, however, he overclaims both the novelty and the importance of his story. |
1
|
|
Wild focuses on what he calls the "central neighborhoods" (14) of the city. Although he admits that they were not necessarily geographically central to Los Angeles, he contends that they were central to the lives of poor, immigrant, and African American Angelenos who were excluded from residence elsewhere in the city. The ethnoracial heterogeneity of these districts, Wild argues, was a source of anxiety to Anglo elites who feared the disease, radical politics, and "mongrelized culture" (44) that might emerge from them. The author devotes two chapters to the efforts of Anglo elites to "reform" these districts through what he calls "corporate reconstruction" (39). Drawing on the work of Martin Sklar, Wild sees the work of California Commission on Immigration and Housing, the Los Angeles City Planning Commission, and the social gospelinfluenced Church of All Nations as pieces of a larger shift toward a liberal corporate political economy.2 Wild argues that Anglo reformers strove to impose order on what they saw as ethnic and racial chaos, sometimes through assimilation of heterogeneous populations and at other times through their isolation and segregation. These efforts failed in the pre-war period, Wild says, to quash the ethnic mixing that Anglos feared. In a short conclusion, however, he argues that post-war suburbanization, redlining, and urban renewal transformed the mixed neighborhoods into monoethnic "inner-city" districts (206). |
2
|
|
The bulk of the book is devoted to exploring the cultural mixing that characterized, inWild's view, the pre-war city.Wild divides his analysis of this mixing into two categories: everyday life and politics. Wild's study of everyday life devotes attention to the world of children, tracing a trajectory from the innocent cross-ethnic mixing of early childhood through the more segregated worlds of adolescents in school and workplace. Another chapter examines the sexual mixing that occurred in the central neighborhoods, through both commercial sex and non-commercial romantic attachments that bridged ethnic and racial boundaries. In his treatment of politics,Wild examines the tradition of soapbox speaking used by the Socialist Party,Wobblies, and others to build multi-ethnic coalitions in the pre-World War I period, and the public rallies such as the 1930 Hunger Marches that the Communist Party employed for the same purpose during the Depression. |
. . . |
There are about 474 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|
