You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Journal of Social History online. About 361 words from this article are provided below; about 764 words remain.
 
If you are an individual subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of Social History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Review | Journal of Social History, 40.3 | The History Cooperative
40.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2007
Previous
Next
Journal of Social History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

REVIEWS


Sacred Boundaries: Religious Coexistence and Conflict in Early-Modern France. By Keith P. Luria (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005. xxxviii plus 357 pp. $69.95).

The sixteenth-century French Wars of Religion stand out as the most extreme case of Europeans killing each other in the age of the Protestant and Catholic Reformations. In no other state in western Europe did civilians turn on each other in such force—often neighbor against neighbor—killing each other in their thousands. The St. Bartholomew's massacres in 1572 are often highlighted as the bloodiest examples of this violence. A combination of significant Huguenot growth in the 1550s and 60s, the vacillating religious policies of the crown, as well as some extremist rhetoric on both sides of the confessional divide all helped to produce an unprecedented civil war that lasted two generations. Indeed, the principal task of historians of sixteenth-century France has been to explain why this degree of violence occurred in France and nowhere else in Europe during the Reformation. The situation changed markedly in 1598, however, as the Edict of Nantes ushered in a period of religious co-existence. The new king Henry IV, himself a recently converted Huguenot, pushed an agenda of harmony and co-existence that ended the civil wars and sought to establish a peaceful coexistence between the two confessions. To be sure, religious tensions and the occasional outbreak of violence continued long after 1598, but the situation on the ground was very different: French Catholics were no longer massacring their Huguenot neighbors, and Huguenots were no longer ransacking and destroying Catholic churches. Indeed, they were being forced by the state to learn to coexist peacefully. That is, they were forced to learn how to break down the cultural barriers and boundaries that had been built up so solidly over the course of the religious wars by the political and clerical elites. Keith Luria's Sacred Boundaries is a rich and sophisticated analysis of how surprisingly successful this policy was over the course of the seventeenth century; and I say surprisingly, because Henry IV's son and grandson eventually abandoned his policy of peaceful coexistence in favor of a return to repression. . . .

There are about 764 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.