You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Journal of Social History online. About 345 words from this article are provided below; about 10538 words remain.
 
If you are an individual subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of Social History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Jan Dumolyn | Nobles, Patricians and Officers: The Making of a Regional Political Elite in Late Medieval Flanders | Journal of Social History, 40.2 | The History Cooperative
40.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2006
Previous
Next
Journal of Social History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 

NOBLES, PATRICIANS AND OFFICERS: THE MAKING OF A REGIONAL POLITICAL ELITE IN LATE MEDIEVAL FLANDERS

By Jan Dumolyn University of Ghent


In the county of Flanders the late medieval period was an era of important social mobility among the dominant classes, as a result of the formation process of the Burgundian state. I argue that in the course of the later Middle Ages, and more specifically in the period of Burgundian domination (1384–1492), a regional political elite was made, as much as it made itself, in the county of Flanders, to paraphrase E. P. Thompson .1 Significant groups of the lower and higher nobility, the urban and rural dominant classes who did not belong to the nobility and the new social group of princely officers, itself made up of noble and non-noble elements, gradually integrated themselves in a 'power elite' on the level of the county of Flanders. They did this by forming social networks based on marriage alliances. They had common political and material interests and a common political ideology stressing the service to the state and the 'common good'. To establish empirically the early phases of such a 'political elite' from the integration of several previously distinct elite groups, I will use the following criteria. First, the careers of princely officers necessitated increased regional mobility, which led to the forging of connections between the different and previously more isolated urban and rural elite groups. This led, secondly, to a more profound social heterogeneity by means of marriages among the different elite groups. In turn this development, fuelled by the state formation process, created larger social networks encompassing patricians, nobles and non-noble rural elites. The families of mixed social origin adopted the ideology of the noble lineage, with a 'genealogical consciousness'. Thirdly, I want to show that important layers of this composite political elite developed into what could be considered a new 'state nobility' whose political ideology was to defend the bonum commune or commonwealth of the Burgundian state, abandoning the traditional autonomism of the Flemish urban political elites. 1
   
. . .

There are about 10538 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.