|
|
|
REVIEWS
| Becoming Old Stock: The Paradox of German American Identity. By Russel A. Kazal (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. vii plus 383, with maps, tables, and index.).
|
| Ethnic identity is both a historical and a local affair. Becoming old Stock helps us understand these and other important coordinates of ethnicity. It is a very smart book about German-Americans, arguably the nation's largest ethnic group. %It surely joins a list of the best studies on ethnic identity. Bristling with insights into the formation, suppression, divisions, and disappearance of German identity in Philadelphia, it provides a methodology and a comparison for studying other twentieth century urban centers with large German populations and other ethnic groups. Though in places belabored and repetitious, Becoming Old Stock is keenly thought and imaginatively researched, joining quantitative methods, written and oral sources, while making use of and the best secondary literature. |
1
|
|
Kazal's work affirms what should be, but what is not obvious to every student of ethnicity: Ethnicities have histories. They are not fixed, static, and enduring, but rather change—mutate, alter, metamorphose, and disappear—over time. Whiteness and blackness, mutable and diverse terms, have, as do all their "colored cousins," histories and can be understood as inventions. In any case, ethnic identity, whatever its forms, does not have its roots in unchanging race or immutable tradition, and is inseparable from change and its historical and literary invention. Kazal authoritatively shows ethnicity is not only shaped by society and nation at large, but is a result of specific settings, or %local conditions, traditions, institutions, and neighbors—or what Kathleeen Conzen has nicely formulated as the "pluralisms of place." |
2
|
|
Kazal begins his book with Philadelphia in 1900, when the city's German population formed part of the third largest group in the nation. Nevertheless its number and concentration of German immigrants lagged far behind those of German populations in New York, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis, and other cities. Kazal pays special attention to Philadelpia's diverse German neighborhoods, which are characterized by different ethnic densities, religious, class and generational concentrations, and group interactions. He points out profound differences between German Protestants, who were quicker to abandon the language and faster to assimilate, and German Catholics, who built more schools, intermarried more frequently with fellow Catholics, and were more closely tied to labor and then working class associations. |
3
|
|
The spine of Kazal's narrative falls in the period from 1900 to 1930. At the outset he judiciously reminds us that German identity was repeatedly broken on the rock of religious, class, and political division since German immigration in the 1830s until the end of the Second World War and subsequent revelations about the Holocaust. % set tombstones on the German ethnic ideal. Recognizing the national suppression of German identity during the two world wars, Kazal's volume shows that abandonment of Germanness and German assimilation to a national identity belonged to two other periods. At the end of the nineteenth century, Germans accepted the invitation to become "old stock Americans" on the basis of belonging to one of the two northern white races of Europe (British and Teutonic) to differentiate themselves from the waves of new immigrants from southern and eastern Europe. Starting in the interwar years and accelerating in post World War Two period, Germans took up an identity as "white ethnics." This expressed their solidarity with fellow Italians, Irish and others and to state their opposition to the growing presence of Blacks in their neighborhoods. |
. . . |
There are about 629 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|
