You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Journal of Social History online. About 342 words from this article are provided below; about 760 words remain.
 
If you are an individual subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of Social History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of Social History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Review | Journal of Social History, 40.2 | The History Cooperative
40.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2006
Previous
Next
Journal of Social History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

REVIEWS


Rethinking Home. A Case for Writing Local History. By Joseph A. Amato (Berkeley, University of California Press, 2002. xvi plus 245 pp. $48.00 cloth, $18.95.).

The problem with traditional writings that fall under the heading of `local history' is precisely that they tend to be rather too local—they lack reference to any greater whole. This is well known to everyone involved in history. They also know that such works are often very dull: there is a lack of overview, authors lose themselves in the fine details without recognizing their significance, and the material often seems addressed to only a highly restricted audience. Much local history lies on the borders of what one would consider 'academic' tending to be produced by or with the support of amateur historians and therefore failing to reach through to professional historians. But worst of all, these works habitually lack the passion to grip and hold on to their readers' attention, to carry them off into the underworld of the past in the way that history can do when at its best. In fairness, this last failing is perhaps not solely a problem for local historians—the entire subject has to grapple with the reader's attention, with unequal success, as the examples prove. 1
      Joseph Amato's book Rethinking Home. A Case for Writing Local History is not conventional local history, still less a conventional work of history in the accepted sense of the word. It is an unusual and compelling discourse on the past with real power to take its readers by surprise. Amato is a Frenchman taken on by a little institution in the US Midwest (Southwest State College), in a small community of around 12,000 people called Marshall, where he taught for several decades. In the book he focuses on the history of southwestern Minnesota, but against a background of his former specialist area of study, contemporary European intellectual history. This is certainly an unconventional blend and one that has clearly had a constructive influence on his life and work in the field. . . .

There are about 760 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.