You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the JGA online. About 501 words from this article are provided below; about 14826 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of the Gilded Age (1.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Kerry Soper | Performing 'Jiggs': Irish Caricature and Comedic Ambivalence toward Asøsimilation and the American Dream in George McManus's Bringing Up Father | Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 4.2 | The History Cooperative
4.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2005
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


Performing 'Jiggs': Irish Caricature and Comedic Ambivalence toward Assimilation and the American Dream in George McManus's Bringing Up Father

By Kerry Soper, Brigham Young University



     Many fans and scholars of newspaper comics have observed that an excellent way to chart a social history of American culture in the twentieth century is to look at the mainstream comic strip page.1 This may be especially true of the first half of the twentieth century when comic strips were avidly followed by readers from almost all age, class, and ethnic demographics.2 Because of this breadth of popularity, the comics page was a fairly accurate reflector (and occasionally, shaper) of fashions, fads, humor, politics, and racial prejudices. Early cartoonists' ability to place their fingers on the American pulse can largely be attributed to the industry's eagerness to please readers: as a lowbrow entertainment that targeted broad audiences through street corner sales, and later, national syndication, it tried to anticipate the characters, comedy, and ideological content that would attract and retain devoted readers. A few iconoclastic cartoonists such as Al Capp (Li'l Abner) and George Herriman (Krazy Kat) challenged readers with topical satire or appealed to niche audiences with quirky humor and aesthetics; but even the most innovative work in the medium relied on a sort of call and response between core readers, syndicates, editors, and artists—a back and forth that insured that the cartoonist's work resonated with, or spoke for, its fans.

1

     However, the idea of comic strips as an accurate reflector of a cultural era's values is complicated by the fact that the Zeitgeist of each historical era has been artificially simplified by later generations. In reality, these eras bled into each other with a chaotic messiness and played host to many competing impulses, values, and ideologies. The multiethnic composition of the United States further complicates any effort to locate a generation's normative values or ideals. How could a mass medium reflect, for example, the polyglot richness of American culture in urban centers at the turn of the century—a time when diverse ethnic groups mingled and second- and third-generation immigrants were assimilating to varying degrees into mainstream culture?

2
     While it may seem that the comics page as it stands today—with the miniscule size of the strips, the predominance of simplistic gags, and the watered down flavor of the comedy—can do little more than reflect a generalized national Zeitgeist, the medium in its earliest years did reflect urban America's complexity. The comics in the medium's early years were often carnivalesque: multi-voiced, irreverent, given to inverting the social order, and ideologically complex or ambivalent.3 As a result of this carnivalesque tone—an outgrowth of factors related to how the strips were produced, distributed, and received in these early years—the medium gave voice to a host of dynamic, competing values and ideologies. Moreover, this complexity was not only articulated through the comics page as a whole, but also in many individual strips. . . .

There are about 14826 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.