You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the JGA online. About 193 words from this article are provided below; about 258 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of the Gilded Age (1.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Alan Lessoff | Note From The Editor | Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 4.1 | The History Cooperative
4.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
January, 2005
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


Note From The Editor

 



     Ballard Campbell's presidential address, "Economic Causes of Progressivism," which begins this issue, represents a tendency in recent writing on the political history of the period covered by this journal that will manifest itself in several essays over the coming months. The explanatory structure that prevailed in political history from around 1970 until a few years ago—the New Political History of party systems, realignments, critical elections, and ethnocultural patterns—seemed to set electoral politics in a geological time frame that interacted with events, governance, and public policy mainly in moments of great upheaval, such as the Sectional Crisis or the depression of the 1890s. Twenty-five years ago, historians such as Richard L. McCormick began to notice the problem posed by this conceptual separation between electoral politics and the substance of government.1 Gradually, writings have appeared that attempt to reconnect elections and governance, resulting in a more fluid political history, contingent on policy decisions and on medium-term and short-term events. Perhaps the detour through the New Political History will result in political history that is more sensitive to entrenched voting patterns but still attentive to personalities and situations.

1
. . .

There are about 258 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.