|
|
|
Hidden Laborers: Female Day Workers in Detroit, 187019201
Kyle E. Ciani, Illinois State University
|
On October 1, 1898, twenty-year-old
laborer Peter Dumbrowski married Lettie, a girl from his Detroit
neighborhood. Both of their Polish immigrant families had left
their new Canadian homes in 1881, joining thousands of other families
who had already moved south for the promise of good wages in an
emerging city.2 The following summer, at the age of
seventeen, Lettie gave birth to their first daughter and would
soon be pregnant with a son. Peter earned enough as a metalworker
to support the small family as well as make a down payment toward
the purchase of a six-room home on the west side. By Peter's fortieth
birthday, he could claim that he made thirty dollars a week at
one of Detroit's most important employers of men, Timken Detroit
Axle. His eldest son, now sixteen, contributed to the family economy
most of his salary (twenty dollars per week) from another key
operation, Insulated Wire Works.
|
1
|
|
The Dumbrowski men fit the profile
of Detroit's industrial workforce—male immigrants securing
a good life for their families with steady and earnest labor provided
by the automobile industry—but Lettie's labor as a day worker
offers another critical element to understanding the lives of urban
families. Workers in such Midwestern centers of commerce and manufacturing
as Chicago, Detroit and Pittsburgh could not survive solely on wages
earned by male heads of households or adolescent children. Rather,
a significant segment of working-class families depended on wages
earned by wives and mothers who engaged in "day work," defined by
one agency as domestic labors such as "laundr[y], cleaning, and
general housework."3 In fact, one historian
of domestic service has argued that the entrenchment of married
women and mothers in the occupation transformed it in the early
twentieth century from "predominantly live-in to live-out work."4 |
2
|
|
Information on day workers is sketchy,
but figures tallied by institutions other than government—by
agents operating employment bureaus, by care providers at day
nurseries located in settlement houses, by public officials administering
mothers' pensions—point to the centrality of day work in
urban families. When social workers with Detroit Public Welfare
(DPW) interviewed Lettie in 1915 they found that despite Peter's
wages the Dumbrowskis lived a troubled life. After twenty years
of marriage, Lettie had given birth to nine living children and
endured her husband's excessive drinking, taunts, and beatings.
Because Peter's temperament often caused him to lose work, she
supported the family with day work. Ultimately, the security of
the Dumbrowski family depended on Lettie's regular earnings in
day work. Lettie earned only three dollars per week as a day worker,
yet her wages, not Peter's higher but irregular wages were the
dependable, ongoing source of income that kept the family afloat.
|
. . . |
There are about 14103 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|