You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the JGA online. About 380 words from this article are provided below; about 12159 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of the Gilded Age (1.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Sarah Jo Peterson | Voting for Play: The Democratic Potential of Progressive Era Playgrounds | Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 3.2 | The History Cooperative
3.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2004
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


Voting for Play: The Democratic Potential
of Progressive Era Playgrounds

Sarah Jo Peterson
University of Oklahoma1



     For Massachusetts children, including those in the city of Lynn, December 8, 1908 was a date of particular importance. That day their fathers voted whether their city would accept the new state playground law. The law required cities and towns with over 10,000 residents to provide and maintain playgrounds for the "recreation and physical education of minors."2 In Lynn, as in other cities, a high level of publicity surrounded the referendum. Editorials and front-page advertisements ran in the local papers, and posters hung in business windows. Even children participated. On election day, members of the Lynn Boys' Club paraded the streets wearing banners that proclaimed, "Vote for playgrounds for me." The triumphant "yes" vote of 11,122 to 1,083 set a Lynn record for the first time the citizens had ever turned in a vote that reached five figures.3 By March 1909, thirty-nine Massachusetts cities and towns had held referendums; all but two agreed to impose the new law on themselves.4

1

     The Progressive Era witnessed a flowering of positive attitudes towards play for both children and adults. Contentions that play promoted "idleness and incorrigibility" and social theories that had led to the spread of "no-recess" policies after the Civil War lost popularity.5 Upper-class philanthropists, middle-class reformers, and working-class groups appear to have agreed who most needed playgrounds: children who had nowhere else to play but the streets. This meant the children of the urban, working classes living in densely constructed housing.6

2

     From their modest American beginnings in Boston and New York in the 1880s, playgrounds spread rapidly in the first decade of the twentieth century. In 1900, only eleven of the United States' 100 most populous cities provided playgrounds. By the end of 1907, fifty-seven of them did, with thirty-eight receiving at least partial municipal funding. By 1909, seventy-seven of the top 100 cities provided playgrounds, with at least fifty-five supported by some municipal funding. Playgrounds had moved into smaller communities as well: 259 cities over 5,000 residents, but not among the top 100, had been converted to playgrounds.7

3
. . .


There are about 12159 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.