|
|
|
New Perspectives on Socialism I:
The Socialist Party Revisited
Richard Schneirov
Indiana State University
|
The essays contained in this and
the October 2003 special issues of the Journal of the Gilded
Age and Progressive Era were originally delivered at a conference
sponsored by Indiana State University, the repository of the Debs
papers and site of his house, now a national landmark. Intended
to commemorate the one hundredth anniversary of Debs' first run
for the presidency, the conference themes of socialism and dissent
attracted a diverse group of scholars, intellectuals, and activists.
Their contributions help us gauge the state of the field. They
also suggest new departures in the study of socialism.
|
1
|
|
Socialism Ð in popular definition
the political movement to replace private ownership of productive
property and the profit motive with democratic and collective
control of the modern economy Ð dated in the United States to
the early nineteenth century. Prior to the Civil War, most socialists,
inspired by such thinkers as Robert Owen and Charles Fourier,
sought to withdraw from the existing market society and establish
alternative communities. "Scientific" or working class-based
socialism came to America with German-speaking immigrants. Initially
divided between followers of Ferdinand Lassalle and Karl Marx,
these socialists believed that the evolution of capitalist society
itself created the basis for socialism by replacing household-based
production with social production and by creating a large wage-labor
class with no interest in the preservation of private property.
In the Marxist version, which by the late 1880s had attained ascendancy,
trade unions acted as the incubators of class-consciousness, which
would unite the working-class in a struggle to overthrow the class
rule of the capitalists. Before 1900, the Socialist Labor Party
(SLP) served as the base for the trade union and political activities
of these largely immigrant Socialists.1
|
2
|
|
The decade of the 1890s was the
critical turning point in the growth and development of the socialist
movement in America. Responding to economic crisis, turbulent
and violent strikes, agrarian unrest, the formation of the Populist
Party, and the corporatization of business and industry, significant
numbers of middle class reformers rejected the still-powerful
politics of anti-monopolism and began a hesitant but eventually
decisive acceptance of the changes brought by industrialization,
nationalized market relations, and the rise of the corporation.
Among the array of new political possibilities, many began a serious
consideration of socialism. But rather than the Marxian socialism
of the SLP, they turned to non-revolutionary, ethical forms of
socialism, evident in the enormous popularity of Edward Bellamy's
utopian socialist novel, Looking Backward. Meanwhile, the sectarian
SLP leadership of Daniel DeLeon estranged many of the party's
labor union members. In 1901 these dissidents, reinforced by middle
class reform elements and ex-Populists, gathered in Indianapolis
to create the Socialist Party of America (SPA).ÊÊÊ
|
3
|
|
. . . |
There are about 2468 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|