You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 176 words from this article are provided below; about 379 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.3 | The History Cooperative
94.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War. By Joel H. Silbey. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. xxii, 230 pp. Paper, $15.95, ISBN 978-0-19-513944-0.)

Joel H. Silbey's thesis in Storm over Texas is straightforward: "the conflict over annexation and ... the political fallout from it, has fair claim as the critical base point on which the rest of the crisis of the union grew" insofar as annexation shifted "the dynamics of American politics" away from partisan divisions and toward sectional divisions (pp. xvii, xviii). Accordingly, following annexation, U.S. politics moved away from a "political vocabulary" of partisan competition expressed in the terms of dangers to "republican liberty," toward a vocabulary that "held sectional concerns to be the center of affairs" and demonized other sections (pp. 18–20). At this level of generality Silbey's thesis seems to resemble that of other political historians (see, for instance, Michael Morrison's 1997 Slavery and the American West), but what makes this book distinctive is its explanatory model for this political transformation. . . .

There are about 379 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.