You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 193 words from this article are provided below; about 382 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.3 | The History Cooperative
94.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Sovereignty and Possession in the English New World: The Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576–1640. By Ken MacMillan. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. xiv, 235 pp. $90.00, ISBN 978-0-521-87009-2.)

Given the growing interest in the English empire's transatlantic constitution, this exhaustively researched and gracefully written monograph is important historiographically and substantively, and deserves a wide and critical readership. Ken MacMillan argues persuasively that England was forced to employ Roman law rules concerning sovereignty and land acquisition to gain international recognition of English New World settlements. Drawing on book 41 of Justinian's Digest and book 2 of his Institutes, English civilian lawyers insisted that in natural law and the law of nations, sovereignty over non-Christian territories in the New World was not complete until the land was occupied (pp. 58, 108, 120). In the verbiage of letters patent (charters and proprietorial land grants) the Crown asserted its intention to occupy lands granted, and it followed that assertion of imperium by building strong fortifications and issuing printed maps that asserted and reinforced royal claims of authority over, and familiarity with, the New World (pp. 121, 147, 148 et seq.). . . .

There are about 382 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.