| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 273 words from this article are provided below; about 448 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Liberalism for a New Century. Ed. by Neil Jumonville and Kevin Mattson. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007. xviii, 252 pp. Cloth, $50.00, ISBN 978-0-520-24919-6. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 978-0-520-25071-0.)

The often-neglected irony of Louis Hartz's account of The Liberal Tradition in America (1955) was that there was, in fact, no liberal tradition in America because the existence of a liberal tradition presupposed competing ideologies. And, as Hartz explicitly noted, he was not referring to any actual historical tradition. "Liberalism" was an analytical construct encompassing a variety of values and tendencies that Hartz believed had characterized American society and had sprung from America's exceptional nonfeudal past. Although Hartz, at times, seemed to reify the "liberal tradition," it was the subsequent literature that, in various defenses and critiques, treated liberalism as an actual historical tradition, extending at least from John Locke to the present. It was that literature that spawned now-exhausted debates such as the one about whether the American founding was based on liberal or republican principles. There is, however, a historically specifiable liberal tradition in American political discourse that began with the ascendancy of Franklin D. Roosevelt and his capture and elaboration of the title and that spawned a philosophical counterpart manifest in the work of individuals such as John Dewey. Before that point, "liberal" and "liberalism" had little distinct meaning either in American politics or scholarly commentary. One of the virtues of the essays comprising Liberalism for a New Century is that, for the most part, the volume deals with the actual liberal political tradition in the United States rather than with the abstraction conjured up by academicians.

. . .

There are about 448 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.