You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 223 words from this article are provided below; about 391 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.1 | The History Cooperative
94.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Rural Face of White Supremacy: Beyond Jim Crow. By Mark Schultz. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2005. xviii, 305 pp. $42.00, ISBN 0-252-02960-7.)

It took Mark Schultz sixteen years to document the complex personal relationships between white and black inhabitants of rural Hancock County, Georgia. He recorded more than 180 oral interviews with residents who represented a cross-section of the race, class, educational, and occupational variables in the county. Their memories prompted him to rethink southern history and to claim that "segregation is simply an inadequate model to understand race relations" (p. 7). Schultz found that, until World War II, rural whites in Hancock County constructed their supremacy on a foundation of selective intimacy with blacks, an intimacy based in "ritualized deference and highly personalized violence" (ibid.). Rural whites used oppressive personal relationships more than legalized segregation to limit rural blacks' opportunities. Thus, "in the rural South, physical segregation was not an important agent and symbol of white supremacy, as it obviously was in the urban South" (p. 128). Three factors combined to create rural white supremacy: a racialized way of life instituted through traditional labor systems that forced laborers, regardless of their race, to share space; localized and personal relations that endured across generations; and collective experiences gained through community, church, and shared class status. . . .

There are about 391 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.