You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 602 words from this article are provided below; about 617 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.1 | The History Cooperative
94.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



A Nation among Nations: America's Place in World History. By Thomas Bender. (New York: Hill and Wang, 2006. xii, 368 pp. $26.00, ISBN 0-8090-9527-0.)

Thomas Bender's book is a welcome historical narrative of that portion of the world's surface usually designated as the United States, but told here with reference to contemporary developments among global states, economies, and societies. Bender intends his book as a demonstration of how American historians should overcome the exceptionalism and, indeed, provincialism that he argues have dominated our national narratives since l945. His book is not a world history, but rather a contextualization of American development in light of global processes. Nations, he believes, remain fundamental units of development, but all are shaped by global history, and their histories must be constructed with that awareness (pp. 296–97). 1
      Bender has chosen five major epochs and themes to demonstrate his approach. What is often called the age of discovery or encounter is summarized as part of the discovery of "the ocean world," including the Portuguese, Spanish, and other European voyages around Africa, to the Indian Ocean, and then to transatlantic shores. Drawing on the work of Robin Blackburn, Philip Curtin, Ira Berlin, and many others, Bender rightly devotes much attention to European interaction with the African states of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. He outlines the transformation of slavery from the longstanding practice of impressing captives for service in urban centers in Europe or the Levant to the wholesale shipment of African laborers for harsh latifundial labor in the Americas under coercive discipline, whether with little regard for mortality (as in sugar cultivation) or with greater concern for preserving and reproducing its value as human capital (as in the southern colonies). 2
      A second major unit places the American colonies' break with Britain in the context of the European wars over their imperial territories outside Europe. The third section looks at the American Civil War and Reconstruction in the context of global nation building—what seventy years ago, the Ohio State University historian Robert C. Binkley shrewdly identified as a global federative crisis, as agendas of nationalism and liberal democratization first conjoined across the Western world in l848 and then diverged as state building, territorial consolidation, and the protection of racial elites became dominant aims (Robert C. Binkley, Realism and Nationalism, 1852–1871, 1935). This unit provides the most successful interweaving of parallel stories. The fourth section takes a similar approach for the history of American colonialism and empire, while the final part—following the work of such authors as Robert Wiebe, Daniel Rodgers, and James Kloppenberg—examines reformist responses to industrialism and urbanization. 3
      Bender brings as usual a wide-ranging intellectual curiosity to his research and historiographical manifestos. He has read widely in English-language secondary literature and ventured into some French and Latin American sources. The deployment of comparisons from outside the United States and the citation of revealing commentaries by European observers of American development reinforce his argument for a global framing of U.S. development. I share many of his interpretive orientations—above all concerning the importance of territory, state building, and empire—so I can only welcome his program for American history. 4
      Obviously, no historian can master the history of every large state and society, above all when language mastery is limited, as it must be. Although the historians of other countries and regions may cavil, Bender's source base is adequate for the outline he attempts. Many important foreign contributions exist in translation, and Anglophone scholars have been active in synthesizing the results of research in Asian, African, and imperial history. . . .

There are about 617 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.