You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 190 words from this article are provided below; about 382 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Business of Civil War: Military Mobilization and the State, 1861–1865. By Mark R. Wilson. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. xiv, 306 pp. $45.00, ISBN 0-8018-8348-2.)

Mark R. Wilson's The Business of Civil War is a much-needed analysis of Union production and procurement issues. Relying heavily on unpublished correspondence, contract registers, and payrolls of the Quartermaster's Department, the book examines the commercial and government enterprises that supplied Union armies as well as the policies and personnel of the federal supply bureaucracy. 1
      With few supplies on hand when the war erupted, the federal government initially relied on state governors and even private individuals to outfit new regiments. State efforts proved inadequate and inefficient, evidenced by the lack of uniform standards, purchasing scandals, and escalating costs fueled by competition among the states. By late 1861, Quartermaster General Montgomery Meigs had shifted procurement to a national system, placing federal supply officers in state capitals and limiting the reimbursements paid for state-provided items. Meigs's bureau enjoyed a high degree of autonomy under senior officers who had continental logistics experience and were relatively independent of Republican party influence. . . .

There are about 382 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.