You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 170 words from this article are provided below; about 365 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Society of the Cincinnati: Conspiracy and Distrust in Early America. By Markus Hünemörder. (New York: Berghahn, 2006. 256 pp. $75.00, ISBN 1-84545-107-4.)

The Society of the Cincinnati, a fraternal organization for former Continental Army officers, was the target of remarkable amounts of criticism from various quarters during the 1780s. Despite the fact that the Society centered mostly on social and charitable activities, it was portrayed as a threat to the revolutionary order by an array of anxious republicans—who saw it as a hereditary, militaristic nobility—concerned that the fruits of the Revolution stood threatened in the volatile climate of the crisis-filled decade. Markus Hünemörder probes the reasons behind this vituperation toward what seemed to be, on its surface, a benevolent organization of patriotic veterans. In a tightly argued and briskly written examination of the debate surrounding the Cincinnati during the 1780s, Hünemörder succeeds in placing the controversy within the era's larger political culture and thereby contributes to a more nuanced understanding of this unsettled, formative period. . . .

There are about 365 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.