You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 259 words from this article are provided below; about 444 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Jefferson and the Press: Crucible of Liberty. By Jerry W. Knudson. (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2006. xviii, 221 pp. $34.95, ISBN 1-57003-607-1.)

Journalism, says Jerry W. Knudson, was the "ultimate weapon" in the political warfare of the Republicans and Federalists (p. xiv). Party organizations, philosophical trends, and other factors receive little, if any, attention in Jefferson and the Press. The author therefore needs to explain how the third president was elected with only a fourth of the newspapers, typically the weakest ones, backing him. His answer is that "the Republican press wrote for the people, and the Federalists seemed to write for each other" (p. 178). The Federalists, Knudson says, tended to advance their own interests rather than develop messages that would resonate with the general public. 1
      Federalist policies were evidently unpopular enough to doom the party, but, as Jefferson and the Press indicates, both sides made journalistic combat a priority and ended up battered in the process. Thomas Jefferson worked closely with the editors of the Philadelphia Aurora, Benjamin Franklin Bache and his successor, William Duane. Jefferson helped Bache stay afloat financially and kept up a steady correspondence with Duane, who was sued for libel as many as seventy times by 1806. 2
      Unlike James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, Jefferson avoided entering the journalistic fray himself. Attacks on his reputation made him bitter about the press, an institution he praised hyperbolically before his presidency and again at the end of his life when time had healed wounds. . . .

There are about 444 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.