You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 193 words from this article are provided below; about 411 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Bystander: John F. Kennedy and the Struggle for Black Equality. By Nick Bryant. (New York: Basic, 2006. viii, 545 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-465-0826-7.)

Racial polarization over the last forty years, Nick Bryant argues, can largely be traced to the New Frontier's "strategy of association," a tack so ephemeral that "the black aide Kennedy spent most time [associating] with was George Thomas. His job each morning was to lay out the president's clothes" (p. 219). John F. Kennedy came around after Bull Connor and Birmingham in spring 1963, but "by then it was too late," Bryant contends. The president had missed an eight hundred–day window to pursue "bolder federal policies [that] would almost certainly have had a calming effect" (pp. 473, 465). Instead, he piled "a policy of inaction" on his "strategy of association" to avoid "inflaming the South" and "splintering the Democratic Party." This "miscalculation of immense scale . . . encouraged white supremacists," "provoked tens of thousands of black demonstrators," and so inflamed and splintered southern whites that many of them would soon migrate to the Republican party (the de facto white man's party) (pp. 11, 12). . . .

There are about 411 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.