| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 221 words from this article are provided below; about 379 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Race and the Making of American Liberalism. By Carol A. Horton. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. xii, 300 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-19-514348-5.)

American liberalism has appeared in many variants since the mid-nineteenth century. Practically all forms either were unable to crack the nut of racial inequality or actively buttressed it, according to Carol A. Horton's new study. Anti-caste liberals, who were briefly ascendant during Reconstruction, pressed for an expansive interpretation of the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments to the Constitution that created a single standard of national citizenship and eliminated legal racial discrimination. Some aimed to attack racial inequality at its economic roots through land redistribution, but they were in a minor ity; most anti-caste liberals held private property– ownership sacrosanct and believed that formal equality of individuals was sufficient to end discrimination. In any event, both groups were eclipsed in the 1880s by Darwinian liberals who narrowly interpreted the Reconstruction amendments. They accepted formal civil rights for blacks but rejected federal oversight and were white supremacists. They would not obstruct the rights of African Americans to make contracts, for example, but they adhered to a divine racial hierarchy and would not prevent the enactment of many laws premised on the natural subordination of blacks. With liberalism dominating political discourse, African Americans hurtled toward the nadir.

. . .

There are about 379 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.