You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 488 words from this article are provided below; about 6556 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| An Interview with Lawrence W. Levine by Ann Lage | The Journal of American History, 93.3 | The History Cooperative
93.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 


An Interview with Lawrence W. Levine by Ann Lage




On Black Culture and Black Consciousness and the Use of Theory

1
Ann Lage: The date is July 6, 2005, and I believe this is our ninth session with Larry Levine.

2
Lawrence W. Levine: One of the chief criticisms leveled at Black Culture and Black Consciousness, and other studies of that genre in the seventies and throughout the eighties as well, was that they were limiting and fragmenting.1 3
      Even someone like John Higham, who had complained about homogenizing American history—he meant about class. We forgot all the fights and we homogenized our past. It was a good term. He argued this in '59. By the late seventies he gave a talk in which he said, "Larry Levine is one of the best, but even he fragments the American past. How can we understand the American past if we keep looking at it as a congeries of groups, rather than as a nation?" And that still is a criticism. 4
      I just wanted to say that in fact I think the opposite is true, that is, the more we study these individual groups, the more we understand the process by which, for instance, they come into the culture, they acculturate, they disseminate their own culture, they fit in with the larger culture, the more we begin to understand America, and it isn't fragmenting at all. It's necessary to understand how groups fit together in this culture. 5
      A good example is the part of Black Culture and Black Consciousness ... where I was looking for moments of acculturation after the Civil War, when blacks were now free to move around. When they had mobility, they were free to absorb other cultures in a way they couldn't as slaves, etc., and I thought that in the blues, which rises in the decades after slavery, I had found a chief medium of acculturation. Here's a good sign of acculturation. They're now singing in the solo voice. The "me" is important here. "Look at me. I am broke, I am lonely. I'm important." It's the post-Enlightenment consciousness, which blacks really didn't have in slavery. 6
      But I also found that at the same moment, the music to the blues was revitalizing. It wasn't acculturating. It was moving back toward the group practice, back toward what they brought with them from Africa, revised of course, but nevertheless. And it had such a profound influence on American culture, in turn. 7



 
Figure 1
    Lawrence W. Levine in a photograph from the mid-1990s. Photograph by Bruce Jackson.
 


 
      So that by looking carefully at the group, one can begin to understand its influence in American history, the ways in which American history influenced it, and the process by which groups tend to acculturate, not by giving up everything they have, but by amalgamating what they have. . . .

There are about 6556 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.