You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 191 words from this article are provided below; about 373 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.3 | The History Cooperative
93.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Capital Speculations: Writing and Building Washington, D.C. By Sarah Luria. (Durham: University of New Hampshire Press, 2006. xxxii, 196 pp. Cloth, $65.00, ISBN 1-58465-501-1. Paper, $26.00, ISBN 1-58465-502-X.)

The title is a play on the multiple meanings of each word (capital: seat of government, financial assets, excellent or first-rate; speculation: contemplation, conjecture, risky financial transaction). In case the reader does not get it, the author explains: "I argue that both Washington's successes and its failures can be traced in large part to the practice in which politics, literature, architecture, and urban planning intersect: speculation" (p. xxii). In four essays, organized in pairs around themes of "the politics of circulation" and "models of national domesticity," Sarah Luria speculates upon the intersection of literature, urban planning, politics, and financial speculation (p. xxvi). The author handles the first two components well; her interpretations of Washington-related literature and urban planning texts (expanded to include maps, images, photographs, and the built environment as texts) are for the most part insightful and based on the best current scholarship. Political history, as well as economic history and theory, are less well incorporated. . . .

There are about 373 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.