You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 209 words from this article are provided below; about 429 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.2 | The History Cooperative
93.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



How Far the Promised Land? World Affairs and the American Civil Rights Movement from the First World War to Vietnam. By Jonathan Rosenberg. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005. xvi, 316 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-691-00706-3.)

When Martin Luther King Jr. spoke out against the war in Vietnam on April 4, 1967, at Riverside Church in New York, he was quickly condemned by other civil rights leaders, the media, and the president of the United States. They argued that he should not mix his civil rights activism with international politics, that he should stick to the subject he knew. Yet as Jonathan Rosenberg stated in How Far the Promised Land? King was continuing a tradition of "color-conscious internationalism" that was at least a half century old (p. 1). 1
      According to Rosenberg, color-conscious internationalism had three key characteristics: the conviction that transnational institutions such as the League of Nations and the United Nations had a critical role to play in domestic politics as well as in the international arena; the notion that America had a critical role in shaping world politics that it could not fulfill as long as blacks were oppressed; the desire for people to cooperate across national borders (especially the "imagined communities" of reformers). . . .

There are about 429 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.