Rosanne Currarino

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 348 words from this article are provided below; about 11696 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase this article in PDF form for $10.00.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

Rosanne Currarino | The Politics of "More": The Labor Question and the Idea of Economic Liberty in Industrial America | The Journal of American History, 93.1 | The History Cooperative

The Politics of "More": The Labor Question and the Idea of Economic Liberty in Industrial America

In the midst of the catastrophic depression of the 1890s, American Federation of Labor (AFL) president Samuel Gompers griped that labor was tired of "Sympathy without relief, Mustard without beef." America's workers, he insisted, wanted "more"—"more leisure, more rest, more opportunity ... for going to the parks, of having better homes, of reading books, of creating more desires." "More" was the AFL's official answer to the labor question of the late nineteenth century: the question of how to reconcile a permanent class of wageworkers with a nominally republican society. Faced with proletarianization, drastic economic instability, worker unrest, and a volatile job market, the AFL leadership did not call for an end to wage labor. Instead, it demanded higher wages and shorter hours for workers, demands that were, in the lexicon of the AFL, self-consciously "practical."¹ Although those "pure and simple" demands were couched in economic terms, they moved past narrowly construed monetary concerns to larger questions of social welfare, personal liberty, and full participation in society.² As Gompers explained to the North American Review's readers in 1892, "We tacitly declare that political liberty with[out] economic independence is illusory and deceptive, and that ... only ... as we gain economic independence can our political liberty become tangible and important." "Every advantage gained in the economic condition of the wage-workers," he further insisted, "must necessarily have its political and social effect, not only upon themselves but upon the whole people." For Gompers, demands for "more" were not only calls for higher wages; they were also demands for "all" that was "essential to the exercise and enjoyment of liberty."³

The twenty-eight-year-old Samuel Gompers posed for a portrait in 1878, when he was president of the Cigar Makers International Union Local 144 (CMIU) in New York. His experiences during the depression of the 1870s and with German American socialists in the CMIU shaped what he called his "practical" labor philosophy. Courtesy George Meany Memorial Archives.

. . .

There are about 11696 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.