You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 221 words from this article are provided below; about 372 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.1 | The History Cooperative
93.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Bleeding Blue and Gray: Civil War Surgery and the Evolution of American Medicine. By Ira M. Rutkow. (New York: Random House, 2005. xx, 394 pp. $27.95, ISBN 0-375-50315-3.)

All authors make choices about what to cover in their books and what to leave out. Ira M. Rutkow decided that other important studies of Civil War medicine, such as George Worthington Adams's Doctors in Blue (1952) and Alfred Jay Bollet's Civil War Medicine (2002), read too much like textbooks. Instead, Rutkow wanted to deal with cause-and-effect relationships in Civil War medicine. He chose to do so from a northern perspective because there are more surviving northern sources and because he believes that it was northern developments that most influenced medicine after the war. 1
      Rutkow explains the primitive state of medicine in America when the Civil War began, and discusses Union medical unpreparedness at the time of First Bull Run (1861). He traces the rise of the Sanitary Commission, as well as the rise and fall of its candidate for surgeon general, William A. Hammond. Other attempts at medical reform, such as the establishment of an ambulance corps and pavilion hospitals in cities behind the lines, as well as the greater success of Hammond's plans under his successor Joseph K. Barnes, form the subject of several chapters. . . .

There are about 372 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.