You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 232 words from this article are provided below; about 370 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.1 | The History Cooperative
93.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Law and Order: Street Crime, Civil Unrest, and the Crisis of Liberalism in the 1960s. By Michael W. Flamm. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005. xvi, 294 pp. $34.50, ISBN 0-231-11512-1.)

According to Michael W. Flamm, the "law and order" issue of the 1960s was never as simple as either its proponents or its detractors tried to make it. Republicans claimed that Democrats encouraged lawlessness and mollycoddled criminals; liberals answered that conservatives were racists who undermined civil liberties. Acknowledging racism's role in the formation of the issue, Flamm argues that the origins and uses of the law and order mantra were much more subtle. It was, he explains, both a reaction to a real rise in fear and a conscious manipulation of the American public by conservative Republicans searching for an issue. 1
      Flamm is at his best when tracing the evolution of the term. He begins by emphasizing the impact of the combination of shifting demographic patterns with increasingly vocal and visible civil rights and protest movements and the economic downturn of the manufacturing sector. These changes sensitized many white and black Americans to the instability of their society. Moreover, according to Flamm, Americans increasingly feared the violence of their world. Despite all liberal and scholarly claims to the contrary, Americans believed that the crime rate was going up. The bottom line was: they were afraid. . . .

There are about 370 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.