You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 216 words from this article are provided below; about 391 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature. By Bill Brown. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. xiv, 245 pp. Cloth, $32.00, isbn 0-226-07628-8. Paper, $16.00, ISBN 0-226-07629-6.)

Critical Inquiry coeditor Bill Brown subverts William Carlos Williams's modernist dictum, "'No ideas but in things,'" to ask "why and how we use objects to make meaning, to make or re-make ourselves, to organize our anxieties and affections, to sublimate our fears and shape our fantasies" (p. 4). If Williams's decree aimed to grant "things" a metaphysical integrity impervious to the taint of what Karl Marx called the grotesque ideas of commodity fetishism, Brown rightly recognizes that cultural artifacts are neither autonomous entities nor repositories of false wants. Instead, they "pressure ... us to engage them as something other than mere surfaces" (p. 12)—a "something other," significantly, that, "however mediated by the advance of consumer culture," is "irreducible to that culture" (pp. 12–13). Freed from the determinism of most analyses of reification, his approach views materialism not as a Packardian machination perpetuated by hidden persuaders, but as a connotatively radiant force whose potential surplus of significance generates a reactionary anxiety in some (modernists such as Williams and T. S. Eliot) and a certain swaggered assurance in others (the consumer philosopher Simon Patten). . . .

There are about 391 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.