You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 234 words from this article are provided below; about 390 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Reverence for the Relations of Life: Re-imagining Pragmatism via Josiah Royce's Interactions with Peirce, James, and Dewey. By Frank M. Oppenheim. (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005. xxii, 498 pp. $68.00, ISBN 0-268-04019-2.)

This volume is not a work of history, but rather a lengthy appreciation of the philosopher Josiah Royce. Frank M. Oppenheim, a professor of American philosophy at Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio), has specialized in Royce for many years. The book has three parts in which the author compares Royce to Charles Peirce, then to William James, and finally to John Dewey. The treatments are comparable. Each part mixes biographical information on each thinker and analysis of contrasting doctrines. A final portion of each part—in which Oppenheim makes his own extended judgments and evaluations of the worth of what Royce, Peirce, James, or Dewey has to say on a subject—dominates. The author surveys the connection of the philosophers' views to larger questions of American society and relates their views to deeper issues of religion and the meaning of life. 1
      Readers must appraise the author's reflections in the light of their own knowledge and values, but Oppenheim's aim is clear. He wants to establish a Roycean vision of America and to suggest how the United States might live up to that vision, and he wants to reconfigure Royce in the canon of great American thinkers. . . .

There are about 390 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.