You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 150 words from this article are provided below; about 387 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Disfranchisement Myth: Poor Whites and Suffrage Restriction in Alabama. By Glenn Feldman. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2004. xvi, 311 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8203-2615-1.)

The core claim of The Disfranchisement Myth is that poor southern whites were more racist and more willing to act on that racism in late nineteenth-century elections than most historians have acknowledged. Southern historians (especially C. Vann Woodward, J. Morgan Kousser, Michael Perman, and Samuel Webb), Glenn Feldman argues, have mythologized hill country whites' opposition to disfranchisement. Feldman sets out to demolish this "myth." 1
      As a sociologist, even one trained in the South and whose recent book has analyzed the history of disfranchisement, I may have failed to discern the myth that Feldman says governs southern historiography. Still, I know what I read and find Feldman's notion of the disfranchisement myth overblown at best and seriously misleading at worst. . . .

There are about 387 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.