You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 275 words from this article are provided below; about 496 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Impossible to Hold: Women and Culture in the 1960s. Ed. by Avital H. Bloch and Lauri Umansky. (New York: New York University Press, 2005. viii, 342 pp. Cloth, $65.00, ISBN 0-8147-9909-4. Paper, $22.00, ISBN 0-8147-9910-8.)

Any discussion of women in the 1960s tends to conjure up visions of hippie chicks or bra-burning women's libbers in the minds of many of today's students. In an effort to bring some reality to this subject, Avital H. Bloch and Lauri Umansky have collected an eclectic series of essays about women in the 1960s who break, bridge, confront, and connect cultural themes from the 1950s to the 1970s in diverse and surprising ways. Some of the subjects discussed here would call themselves feminists, but others would not, and, while some are countercultural, none could be classified as hippie chicks. 1
      Bloch and Umansky explain the origins and organization of the book in the introduction. While men may have dominated the antiwar and civil rights movements that characterize that decade (a point that some feminist scholars might argue with, by the way), women have proven to be equally significant in shaping the larger cultural legacy of the 1960s. The subjects of these essays have been divided into four categories: those who broke into typically male-dominated fields (astronauts, architects, athletes, science fiction writers); those who built bridges between earlier moderate and later radical cultural movements (beat poetry, folk and popular music, dance); those who confronted hegemonic power structures (the church, the antiwar movement, rock and roll); and, finally, those who connected cultural expressions (music, art, dance, and literature) of the 1960s in an explicitly gendered way. . . .

There are about 496 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.