You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 153 words from this article are provided below; about 359 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Pure Fire: Self-Defense as Activism in the Civil Rights Era. By Christopher B. Strain. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2005. x, 254 pp. Cloth, $49.95, ISBN 0-8203-2686-0. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 0-8203-2687-9.)

Christopher B. Strain's Pure Fire is an ambitious analysis of the development of self-defense in the black revolt. It joins Lance Hill's important The Deacons for Defense (2004). Beginning with an examination of the ideas of individual self-protection rooted in American law, Pure Fire is chiefly an intellectual history, surveying the vast subject of African American thinking about self-defense and violence. The howling contradiction to natural rights doctrine was American slavery, which denied the right of self-defense against the planter's slave-whipping barbarism. Above all, this book grounds its arguments in the legal and ethical justifications for self-preservation, and its major persuasive proposition is that personal self-defense was an integral component of emancipation and civil rights for African Americans. . . .

There are about 359 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.