You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 380 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.3 | The History Cooperative
92.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Exploring Lewis and Clark: Reflections on Men and Wilderness. By Thomas P. Slaughter. (New York: Knopf, 2003. xviii, 231 pp. $24.00, ISBN 0-375-40078-8.)

Exploring Lewis and Clark is an intriguing, albeit sometimes baffling and even irritating, examination of the expedition of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark using the explorers' journals as both perspective and point of departure. As have some other works on the expedition, Thomas P. Slaughter's deals with the explorers and their exploration nonchronologically. What separates Slaughter's work from other nonchronological approaches such as Albert Furtwangler's Acts of Discovery (1993) or James Ronda's Finding the West (2001) is an inherent lack of objectivity on the part of the author. This is a book that seems to have been written with pre-invented conclusions, into which events of the journey of exploration are shoehorned to make the point that "neither the journals nor the explorers are what they seem" (p. xviii). But the author then proceeds to tell us what the journals are, as viewed through his own particular lenses. Hence, the book is not really about the Lewis and Clark expedition, nor is it really about the Lewis and Clark journals. What it is about is one person's interpretation of Lewis's and Clark's interpretation of their journey, presented with all the self-indulgence, moral rectitude, and intellectual certitude of the postmodernist scholar. . . .

There are about 380 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.